Thin Film Processes 1978
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-728250-3.50009-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planar Magnetron Sputtering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This represents the meso-porosity of the layer. The ppg layer appears, instead, more compact, similarly to what reported in the literature3745464748. Accordingly, after thermal treatments, grain coalescence causes a shrinkage of the pores in the ppg layer (especially at the surface: see Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This represents the meso-porosity of the layer. The ppg layer appears, instead, more compact, similarly to what reported in the literature3745464748. Accordingly, after thermal treatments, grain coalescence causes a shrinkage of the pores in the ppg layer (especially at the surface: see Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…An optimum inclination angle of 12.7° was identified in our setup as a compromise between the shadowing effect by the starting TiO 2 seeds (this define the lower limit in θ) and the verticalization of the Ti flux by increasing θ, that has a tendency to progressively close the pores by proceeding the deposition. Hereafter we refer to our refined methodology at inclination angle of 12.7° as gig-lox; the reference process, related to the use of a standard parallel plate geometry in Thornton conditions45, will be indicated by ppg. See methods and SI for more details.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Target erosion is a feature of all planar magnetron based sputtering sources [30]. It can essentially influence the cluster size distribution [31,32].…”
Section: Influence Of Target Erosionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deposition rates were selected in the range 0.5 to 7 A sec-'. This corresponded to open circuit voltages of 800 to 1400V and deposition working voltages of 400 to 600 V with current values of [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] mA. Chromel-alumel thermocouple measurements indicated that the shadow mask temperature was <50"C for all deposition procedures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%