2010
DOI: 10.1145/1714450.1714453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planarity, Determinants, Permanents, and (Unique) Matchings

Abstract: Abstract. Viewing the computation of the determinant and the permanent of integer matrices as combinatorial problems on associated graphs, we explore the restrictiveness of planarity on their complexities and show that both problems remain as hard as in the general case, i.e. GapL and #P complete. On the other hand, both bipartite planarity and bimodal planarity bring the complexity of permanents down (but no further) to that of determinants. The permanent or the determinant modulo 2 is complete for ⊕L, and we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Limaye et al [2009] have shown that the longest path problem for planar DAGs also is solvable in UL. Finally, Datta et al [2007; use similar weighting techniques to establish improved upper bounds for bipartite planar matching problems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limaye et al [2009] have shown that the longest path problem for planar DAGs also is solvable in UL. Finally, Datta et al [2007; use similar weighting techniques to establish improved upper bounds for bipartite planar matching problems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We know that the reachability in directed planar graphs reduces to bipartite planar matching while the reachability in layered grid graphs reduces to the UPM question in the same [DKLM07]. Note that the isolation step in our algorithm works in Logspace.…”
Section: Other Variationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof. This is described in [DKLM07]. It follows closely the procedure for embedding a planar graph into a grid, described by [ABCDR06].…”
Section: Planar Matching and Grid Graphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of graph embedding into a grid is quite standard. In this context of domino tilings it was used in [DKLM,Val2], and for other small sets of tiles in [BNRR, MR, PY]. Of course, the technical details are somewhat different in each case.…”
Section: Final Remarks and Open Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%