2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2018.03.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plane stress measurement of orthotropic materials using critically refracted longitudinal waves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For SLM forming parts manufactured with 316 L stainless steel, the acoustic-elastic coefficient varies with the scanning strategy used in the forming process. For the same SLM forming parts, the acoustic-elastic coefficient parallel to the LCR wave propagation direction is about three times that of perpendicular to the LCR wave propagation direction, which is consistent with existing research [10]. Figures 10-12 show the ultrasonic testing results of the three kinds of specimens manufactured using meander, stripe, and chess board scanning strategies respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For SLM forming parts manufactured with 316 L stainless steel, the acoustic-elastic coefficient varies with the scanning strategy used in the forming process. For the same SLM forming parts, the acoustic-elastic coefficient parallel to the LCR wave propagation direction is about three times that of perpendicular to the LCR wave propagation direction, which is consistent with existing research [10]. Figures 10-12 show the ultrasonic testing results of the three kinds of specimens manufactured using meander, stripe, and chess board scanning strategies respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In the actual testing process, when the temperature, surface roughness and coupling mode remain unchanged, the acoustic time difference is ∆t i = t i − t i 0 = ∆t M + ∆t S , so as shown in Equations (8)-(10), the acoustic time difference varied linearly with the stress. The constant terms in Equations (8)- (10) indicate the acoustic time difference is caused by the microstructure of material. As shown in Figure 18, 316 L stainless steel specimens manufactured by SLM technology have obvious anisotropic characteristics, and the microstructures vary with the change of the fixed positions of the transducers in the specimen manufactured using the same scanning strategy.…”
Section: Acoustic-elastic Equations For Testing Stress In 316 L Stainmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this method, the ultrasonic wave velocity was measured based on the propagation time obtained through a phase correlation algorithm, and the strain was obtained using a scanning acoustic microscope. Wang et al [19] proposed an equation that determined the relationship between the stress, in the area beneath the surface, and propagation time of critically refracted longitudinal waves in a carbon-fiber-reinforced plastic composite, and concluded that the propagation time was linearly dependent on the stress. They calculated that the acoustoelastic coefficient was consistent with the experimental results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ramasamy et al [24] proved the effectiveness of L CR waves by comparing the finite element simulation method with the L CR experimental method. Wang et al [25] presented the velocity variations of L CR waves induced by orthotropic anisotropy and internal stresses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%