Planes individuales de apoyo: mejora de los resultados personales

Loon, Jos H. M. Van

doi:10.14201/scero20154612540

Cited by 9 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Thus, our proposal is that data obtained through the Support Needs and Strategies for Physical Activity Scale should be included in the ISP, with the information gathered by the Supports Intensity Scale (SIS; Thompson et al, 2004 ) and use this information to provide individualized supports in the life activities. Additionally, like with the implementation of the ISP ( van Loon, 2015 ), it is essential to identify what is important for the person and integrate their goals in the PA field into individualized plans. At the moment, we have no data on the funding for the provision of individualized support for PA. Future research will focus on this topic considering the previous works related to the SIS and resource allocation ( Fortune et al, 2008 , Giné et al, 2014 ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Structural Equation Model of the relationship between physical activity and quality of life

Carbó‐Carreté

Guàrdia‐Olmos

Giné

et al. 2016

International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background/Objective: Literature shows that practicing physical activity improves the general health and quality of life of people with intellectual disabilities. However, there is little empirical research on the specific benefits physical activity provides and to what extent these benefits occur. The goal of this study was to examine the impact of perceptions of physical activity and the individualized support on each of eight quality of life-related domains and three higher-order quality of life factors. Method: The sample consisted of adults with intellectual disability (n = 529), their assigned professionals (n = 522), and a family member (n = 462). Most participants attended day and residential services, and we applied the Personal Outcomes Scale and the Support Needs and Strategies for Physical Activity Scale to all of them. Results: The structural model parameter estimation showed high values, especially for the factor of well-being. These data allowed us to confirm that perceptions of physical and individualized supports in the field of physical activity act as predictors of quality of life improvement. Conclusions: The results suggest that organizations devoted to enhancing personal outcomes should include physical activity in their programs, and revise both their own services and the use of physical activity resources available in the community.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Structural Equation Model of the relationship between physical activity and quality of life

Carbó‐Carreté

Guàrdia‐Olmos

Giné

et al. 2016

International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Separate from the aforementioned two issues, we consider a new question regarding the severity of the participants' ID. Personal outcomes are interpreted as a result of a process wherein the person's individual support needs have been evaluated and minimised thanks to the provision of adequate support (Schalock & Verdugo 2012;van Loon 2015). This approach to persons with ID originates from the latest publications in the ID concept (Luckasson et al 2002;Schalock et al 2010), which argues that the focus of an ID on the person's 'defect' is increasingly outdated and should shift towards an understanding centred on the person and their environment.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of the intellectual disability severity in the Spanish Personal Outcomes Scale

Carbó‐Carreté

Guàrdia‐Olmos

Peró‐Cebollero

et al. 2019

J intellect Disabil Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The interest in measuring quality of life (QoL) in persons with intellectual disability (ID) has brought about a number of QoL measurements for this population. These measurements need to address two issues that have contributed to enhancing the current instruments. First, the necessity to develop measures with adequate psychometric properties, which has been discussed in recent studies, and second, the agreement between experts in analysing objective and subjective perspectives, as well as the use of self‐report to include the participation of the person with ID. The question that we set out to investigate in this paper is whether the measurements function properly for the person with ID, independent of their level of severity. We used the Spanish version of the Personal Outcomes Scale, as it is a psychometrically sound instrument and includes three sources of information (the person with ID, a professional and a family member). Method The sample was composed of 529 persons with ID (296 men, representing 55.95% of the total sample, and 233 women, with Mage = 35.03, SD = 10.82) from several regions of Spain, along with their professional of reference and a family member. The severity variable was estimated for each item based on estimations of differential item functioning. Results The results showed that several items were undervalued by the assessments if the severity of the ID was greater. Mainly, this difference was observed in the assessments by professionals and in the dimensions of rights, personal development and self‐determination. Conclusions This paper focuses on the uses and interpretations of the results of the QoL measurements in the Personal Outcomes Scale. The results indicate that, in our sample, when people with high levels of ID are assessed, the functioning of some items are affected by the severity of this disability. For correct use, these items must be interpreted on the basis of the results obtained. Additionally, it is necessary to thoroughly review the QoL indicators for persons with severe or profound ID.

show abstract

“…Un plan de apoyos debe recoger qué quiere la persona y qué ayudas necesita. Lo que se busca es la mejora del bienestar de la persona (Van Loon, 2015).…”

Section: Resultados Personales: Una Perspectiva Longitudinal De La Caunclassified

Resultados personales: una perspectiva longitudinal de la calidad de vida

Ramos¹,

Foronda²,

Martínez³

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ampros, Anfas, Aspanias, Atades, Gautena, Gorabide y Plena inclusión presentan una investigación cuyo objetivo es evaluar el impacto del plan individualizado en el que se incluyen los objetivos personales, la calidad de vida y la percepción de las personas. Se establecen puntos de referencia en un análisis longitudinal de los resultados. Con carácter previo a la elaboración del plan individual de cada persona, se han evaluado las necesidades de apoyo y la calidad de vida. En total, han participado 77 personas con discapacidad con diferentes necesidades de apoyo. Los objetivos de cada plan individual se han valorado al finalizar el primer año y al acabar el segundo, momento en el cual se volvieron a aplicar las escalas antes citadas. Se observan diferencias significativas en los resultados obtenidos en función de las necesidades de apoyo y la valoración que realizan los profesionales según los años de contacto con la persona con discapacidad. Se deben tener en cuenta las diferencias por la edad de los participantes, los problemas de comportamiento y la consecución de los objetivos individuales.

show abstract

Planes individuales de apoyo: mejora de los resultados personales

Abstract: planes individuales de apoyo: mejora de los resultados personales jos h. m. van loon

Cited by 9 publications

References 11 publications

A Structural Equation Model of the relationship between physical activity and quality of life

A Structural Equation Model of the relationship between physical activity and quality of life

Impact of the intellectual disability severity in the Spanish Personal Outcomes Scale

Resultados personales: una perspectiva longitudinal de la calidad de vida

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About