Planktonic and Sessile Artificial Colonic Microbiota Harbor Distinct Composition and Reestablish Differently upon Frozen and Freeze-Dried Long-Term Storage

Abstract

Biofilm-associated, sessile communities represent the major bacterial lifestyle, whereas planktonic cells mainly appear during initial colonization of new surfaces. Previous research, mainly performed with pathogens, demonstrated increased environmental stress tolerance of biofilm-growing compared to planktonic bacteria. The lifestyle-specific stress response of colonic microbiota, both natural and fermentation produced, has not been addressed before. Planktonic and sessile “artificial” colonic microbiota delivered by PolyFermS continuous fermentation models can provide a controllable and reproducible alternative to fecal transplantation in treating gastrointestinal disorders. We therefore characterized planktonic and sessile microbiota produced in two PolyFermS models inoculated with immobilized fecal microbiota and comparatively tested their levels of tolerance of frozen storage (–80°C) and freeze-dried storage (4°C) for 9 months to mimic preservation strategies for therapeutic applications. Sessile microbiota harbored next to shared taxa a unique community distinguishable from planktonic microbiota. Synergistetes and Proteobacteria were highly represented in sessile microbiota, while Firmicutes were more abundant in planktonic microbiota. The community structure and metabolic activity of both microbiota, monitored during standardized reactivation batch fermentations, were better preserved after frozen storage than dried storage, indicated by higher Bray-Curtis similarity and enhanced recovery of metabolite production. For both lifestyles, reestablishment of Bacteroidaceae was impaired after frozen and dried storage along with reduced propionate formation. In contrast, butyrate production was maintained after reactivation despite compositional rearrangements within the butyrate-producing community. Unexpectedly, the rate of recovery of metabolite production was lower after preservation of sessile than planktonic microbiota. We speculate that higher functional dependencies between microbes might have led to the lower stress tolerance of sessile than planktonic microbiota. IMPORTANCE Fecal microbiota transplantation has been successfully applied in the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection and has been suggested as an alternative therapy for other intestinal disorders such as inflammatory bowel disease or metabolic syndrome. “Artificial” colonic microbiota delivered by PolyFermS continuous fermentation models can provide a controllable and reproducible alternative to fecal transplantation, but effective preservation strategies must be developed. In this study, we systematically investigated the response of sessile and planktonic artificial colonic microbiota to cryopreservation and lyophilization. We suggest that functional redundancy is an important factor in providing functional stability with respect to exposure to stress during processing and storage. Functional redundancy in compositionally reduced microbial systems may be considered when designing microbial products for therapy.

Surface Properties of Parabacteroides distasonis and Impacts of Stress-Induced Molecules on Its Surface Adhesion and Biofilm Formation Capacities

“…After the colonization of a surface by planktonic cells, a conversion into a sessile lifestyle is essential for bacteria in order to protect themselves against environmental stress (physical stress, antibiotics, etc.). This protection is provided by a matrix usually composed of exopolysaccharides, that improve the capture of nutrient by bacteria, as helped by the spongy structure of the exopolymeric matrix and by an increased enzyme retention that leads to more-efficient substrate conversion [ 55 ]. The bacterial transition from planktonic lifestyle to biofilm organization requires changes in gene expression and physiological modification that ensure the production of the extracellular matrix and the up/down-regulation of genes involved in the synthesis of factors required for biofilm formation, such as adhesion factors needed for the settling of the adhesion step [ 56 ].…”

Identification of Valerate as Carrying Capacity Modulator by Analyzing Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Colonization of Colonic Microbiota in vitro

“…Total 16S rRNA gene copy numbers were determined by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) using the Eub_339F (ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAG) and Eub_518R (ATTACCGCGGCTGCTGG) primer (Guo et al, 2008 ) as described previously (Bircher et al, 2020 ).…”

Artificial Gastrointestinal Models for Nutraceuticals Research—Achievements and Challenges: A Practical Review

“…Modeling of chicken cecal microbiota ecology and metabolism Asare et al [53] Effect of storage on planktonic and sessile artificial colonic microbiota Bircher [54] Effect of dietary nucleosides and yeast extracts on composition and metabolic activity of infant gut microbiota Doo et al [55] Effect of iron on butyrate production by the child's gut microbiota in vitro Dostal et al [56] Clostridium difficile colonization and antibiotics response in elderly intestinal fermentation Fehlbaum et al [57] Modulatory effects of Lactobacillus paracasei CNCM I-1518 on composition and function of elderly gut microbiota Fehlbaum et al [58] Bistable auto-aggregation phenotype in Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Isenring [59] In Vitro Gut Modeling as a Tool for Adaptive Evolutionary Engineering of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum Isenring et al [60] Inhibitory Activity of Microcin J25 (bacteriocin produced by Escherichia coli) Against Salmonella Newport Naimi et al [61] Modulation of lactate metabolism by faecal inoculum, pH and retention Pham et al [62] Prebiotic potential of different dietary fibers Poeker et al [63] Synergistic effects of Bifidobacterium thermophilum RBL67 and selected prebiotics on inhibition of Salmonella colonization Tanner et al [64] 4.4. The TIM-2 Gastro-Intestinal Model…”