2005
DOI: 10.1177/1473095205058495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planning as Anticipation of Resistance

Abstract: This article argues that an inadvertent side effect of the current preoccupation with planning from below has been a lack of attention to public sector planning at the top, which remains a critical institutional mechanism for development. To be effective, however, public sector planners must anticipate institutional resistance to their efforts, particularly from within the state structure, and incorporate this understanding into the formulation and sequencing of planning tasks in unorthodox and counterintuitiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These workshops enable decision makers to better understand what could provoke tensions and conflicts when choosing land-use planning options. They help to bring perceived barriers into sharper focus (Sanyal, 2005).…”
Section: Design Workhopsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These workshops enable decision makers to better understand what could provoke tensions and conflicts when choosing land-use planning options. They help to bring perceived barriers into sharper focus (Sanyal, 2005).…”
Section: Design Workhopsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on development and climate change outlines the limitations of both top-down and bottom-up planning. Escobar (1985), Sanyal (2005), and Clayton et al (2003) argue that top-down perspectives in development are both disempowering and ineffective because they often neglect local issues and overlook the role of local institutions. The literature also highlights the constraints of bottom-up planning, which is often dominated by powerful local elites, thus leaving the poor more marginalized ( Nepal is landlocked multiethnic, multilingual, multi-religious country, situated north of India in the Himalayas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There, most of the senior officials and politicians suggested dropping the ROW restoration idea on the ground that it is obstructing traffic flow, generating dusts and prompting people's oppositions. Sanyal (2005)'s assertion, in this case, is correct that public sector planners must anticipate institutional resistance to their efforts, particularly from within the state structure. Disagreements are not uncommon when participation and cooperation from diverse level of government agencies are involved in a complex development task (Knill & Tosun, 2012).…”
Section: What Happened In Kmc?mentioning
confidence: 81%