Planning for Serious Illness by the General Public: A Population-Based Survey

Abstract

Background. While rates of advance care documentation amongst the general public remain low, there is increasing recognition of the value of informal planning to address patient preferences in serious illness. Objectives. To determine the associations between personal attributes and formal and informal planning for serious illness across age groups. Methods. This population-based, online survey was conducted in Saskatchewan, Canada, in April, 2012, using a nonclinical sample of 827 adults ranging from 18 to 88 years of age and representative of age, sex, and regional distribution of the province. Associations between key predictor variables and planning for serious illness were assessed using binary logistic regression. Results. While 16.6% of respondents had completed a written living will or advance care plan, half reported having conversations about their treatment wishes or states of health in which they would find it unacceptable to live. Lawyers were the most frequently cited source of assistance for those who had prepared advance care plans. Personal experiences with funeral planning significantly increased the likelihood of activities designed to plan for serious illness. Conclusions. Strategies designed to increase the rate of planning for future serious illness amongst the general public must account for personal readiness.

Improving hospital-based end of life care processes and outcomes: a systematic review of research output, quality and effectiveness

“…Increasing awareness about palliative care may lead to more positive impressions, more equitable uptake of services and improved care quality [ 43 ]. While ACP uptake is low among the general public, people are willing to discuss their views about end-of-life issues [ 44 ]. General practitioners are well placed to engage in advance care planning as they see a significant proportion of the population and will often have contextual knowledge about individuals [ 45 ].…”

“You either need help…you feel you don't need help…or you don't feel worthy of asking for it:” Receptivity to bereavement support

“…Cherlin et al (2007) identified receptivity to bereavement services as a critical factor for participation in bereavement support programs. Issues affecting receptivity include family dynamics and other responsibilities, financial status, gender, culturally appropriate services, geographical location, the availability of services, involvement with similar services in the past, lack of anonymity and confidentiality, and lack of sufficient financial and staff resources for bereavement programs by palliative care services (Breen et al, 2014; Breitkopf et al, 2014; Castleden et al, 2010; Cheers et al, 2007; Goodridge et al, 2013; Remedios et al, 2011; Schoolman, 2011; Stark et al, 2007). McGrath (2013) highlights that receptivity comprises complex factors that influence an individuals’ ability or desire to meet their needs.…”

Using the ecological framework to identify barriers and enablers to implementing Namaste Care in Canada’s long-term care system

“…Since the program is designed for individuals with late-stage cognitive impairment, whose memory impairment is likely to hinder awareness that people who attend the program ultimately pass away, we think this unlikely. Nevertheless, death anxiety and taboos about discussing death are well documented (43)(44)(45)(46), including among North American health providers (47)(48)(49). Thus, although conceptualizing Namaste Care as end of life dementia care may help to increase engagement in dedicating resources to the least demanding -and arguably most vulnerable -LTC residents (14,50), this message needs to be delivered carefully, perhaps along with continuing education, in order to avoid creating additional implementation barriers.…”