Planning Modes for Major Transportation Infrastructure Projects (MTIPs): Comparing China and Germany

Abstract

Because major transportation infrastructure projects (MTIPs) have significant effects for a sustainable development, the planning modes used for these projects have been a popular topic among scholars and policy makers. However, detailed descriptions and comparisons of planning modes in different countries are still rare. Therefore, this paper first provides a simple analytical framework based on the elements of the planning goal, the planning process, the planning result and the evaluation criteria. Focusing on the hierarchic mode adopted in China, and the democratic participatory mode adopted in Germany, the governance practices used in MTIP planning are clearly shown. Furthermore, by using two airport cases, this paper compares the differences between China and Germany in the realms of preparation, review, coordination, final approval, and planning performance. The main conclusions are: (1) The analytical approach presented in this paper provides an appropriate standard for describing and comparing planning modes for MTIPs; (2) the planning modes in the two countries each have advantages and disadvantages, reflecting the trade-off between ex ante and ex post costs; (3) the comparison between China and Germany may be instructive for both of these countries and for other countries in terms of improving their planning performance in the future.

Transport Infrastructure Development, Public Performance and Long-Run Economic Growth: A Case Study for the Eu-28 Countries

“…Investigating from the perspective of the growth impact of public infrastructure taking into account public expenditure for investment in infrastructure in stimulating the economic performance, Farhadi [18] find a positive relationship. Zhou et al [31] comparing two countries (e.g. China and Germany) on the planning modes for major transportation infrastructure projects mainly by public budget identify as values prioritizing efficiency and effective in terms of ex post cost savings the strategies including extensive public participation for social harmony with the development of ecological consciousness.…”

The experience of EU countries towards the development of infrastructure and logistics hubs

“…The scientific literature discusses the democratic regime of participation of the German government in the development of large infrastructure projects for sustainable development (Zhou, Tan & Sedlin, 2018). According to the Federal Route Plan until 2030 (Deutscher Bundestag, 2016), from 2016 to 2030, the federal government will invest 226,7 billion EUR in maintaining existing infrastructure, as well as in new projects for the construction and expansion of federal projects for roads, railways and waterways in Germany.…”

An Ex Ante Analysis of the Planned Transportation Network in the Region of Extremadura (Spain) by Using Physical Parameters

“…The methodology focuses on an ex ante study, which compares the current situation and the eventual future scenario, in which all the planned infrastructures have been already built, and QGIS open software has been employed for the analysis of some indicators. This methodology has been widely employed for evaluating planned or constructed transportation networks [40][41][42][43][44]. The method is the following (Figure 2):…”