2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11548-017-1674-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planning of skull reconstruction based on a statistical shape model combined with geometric morphometrics

Abstract: The presented computer-based approach using SSM is a precise and simple tool in the field of computer-assisted surgery. It helps to reconstruct large-size defects of the skull considering the natural asymmetry of the cranium and is not limited to unilateral defects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, it is extensively used for organ segmentation, [36][37][38] to extract morphological bio-markers of (diseased) organs, [39][40][41] or for numerous orthopedic applications. [42][43][44][45][46][47] Although few, several studies-mainly in the field of orthopedics-attempted to relate SSM parameterized anatomical shape variation with Finite Element Analysis (FEA). These studies used SSM and FEA to: investigate the relationship between patellofemoral shape and function 48 ; force-displacement behavior of proximal femurs 49 ; to investigate cervical spine loading, 50 or for real-time prediction of joint-mechanics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, it is extensively used for organ segmentation, [36][37][38] to extract morphological bio-markers of (diseased) organs, [39][40][41] or for numerous orthopedic applications. [42][43][44][45][46][47] Although few, several studies-mainly in the field of orthopedics-attempted to relate SSM parameterized anatomical shape variation with Finite Element Analysis (FEA). These studies used SSM and FEA to: investigate the relationship between patellofemoral shape and function 48 ; force-displacement behavior of proximal femurs 49 ; to investigate cervical spine loading, 50 or for real-time prediction of joint-mechanics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large number of publications in various bio‐medical fields proves that statistical shape modeling is a versatile and widely accepted technique to capture anatomic variation in the population. For example, it is extensively used for organ segmentation, 36‐38 to extract morphological bio‐markers of (diseased) organs, 39‐41 or for numerous orthopedic applications 42‐47 . Although few, several studies—mainly in the field of orthopedics—attempted to relate SSM parameterized anatomical shape variation with Finite Element Analysis (FEA).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, there were several studies using different methods for this situation, including statistical methods, deep learning and so on. For example, Fuessinger MA et al 24 proposed a computer‐based approach to rebuild cranial vault model by employing a statistical shape model (SSM), which combined with the geometric morphometry. They created the SSM based on 131 CT scans of health human, to capture the shape variability of the cranial vault.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The precision of the SSMbased virtual reconstruction, for the midface and the neurocranium, has already been demonstrated. (5,13,14) Future research has to focus on the clinical feasibility of the shown technique. The SSM will be used by the surgeon to plan the fracture reduction preoperatively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(12) As one opportunity, we show the advantages of a statistical shape model (SSM) in preoperative virtual planning for repairing arti cial unilateral midface and neurocranium defects. (13,14) Arti cial bilateral defects of the midface could also be reconstructed satisfactorily. 5The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the application of the SSM for measuring the quality of the postoperative result in the reconstruction of bilateral midface fractures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%