2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10846-016-0344-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planning Robot Navigation among Movable Obstacles (NAMO) through a Recursive Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, many studies have focused on robot navigation among movable obstacles to solve the above freezing problem [17]. The robot pushes objects such as a table, chair, or sofa and clears a reasonable path, considering planning time, length of the transit and/or transfer paths, number of manipulated objects, and total number of displacements of all objects [18][19][20]. This can be regarded as a movement strategy with object manipulation, but those studies just focus on furniture, not humans as dynamic and psychological agents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, many studies have focused on robot navigation among movable obstacles to solve the above freezing problem [17]. The robot pushes objects such as a table, chair, or sofa and clears a reasonable path, considering planning time, length of the transit and/or transfer paths, number of manipulated objects, and total number of displacements of all objects [18][19][20]. This can be regarded as a movement strategy with object manipulation, but those studies just focus on furniture, not humans as dynamic and psychological agents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…World representation NAMO relies on an object-based representation of the world [2,5,6,8,[10][11][12][13][14][16][17][18][19]22,23,[26][27][28][29]31,33] (in opposition to an occupationspace-based one): in order to chose the best obstacle placement, it is necessary to reason about them as separate entities. Final placement selection is what actually tells NAMO apart from the well-known field of Rearrangement Planning [4].…”
Section: Namo: Analysis Of Existing Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NAMO Algorithms rarely seek completeness like [6,8,10,12,28]. None have achieved global optimality, and only Levihn [16,23] can claim a local optimality for a very simplified variant of the problem where a plan can only contain one movable obstacle (see Table 1, 'Comp.'…”
Section: Namo: Analysis Of Existing Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several methods have been proposed for solving the shortest path problem in robot navigation, both for a single or multiple robots and for static or dynamic environments. Visibility graphs have been exploited to identify Euclidean shortest paths among a set of polygonal obstacles in the plane [39]. The method applies a recursive process capable of solving dynamic navigation problems for a single robot.…”
Section: Shortest Path Definition Based On Cellular Structures For Comentioning
confidence: 99%