2016
DOI: 10.1109/tsg.2015.2420711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planning the Coordination of Directional Overcurrent Relays for Distribution Systems Considering DG

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The slow calculation procedure of such a normal evolutionary algorithm (without fast coordination method) cannot satisfy the continuous monitoring and protection of a large scale system or a flexible smart grid where loads and distributed generations [24][25][26][27] continuously connect or disconnect themselves to the grid and change the dynamic situation of the grid. The protection of a smart grid will be more intensive and extremely complicated in presence of fluctuations and a quite long time consuming algorithm without providing optimum results, is not able to follow the instantaneous state of the grid therefore the online/offline protection scheme based on such algorithms would result in mal-operation and serious damages.…”
Section: Analytical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The slow calculation procedure of such a normal evolutionary algorithm (without fast coordination method) cannot satisfy the continuous monitoring and protection of a large scale system or a flexible smart grid where loads and distributed generations [24][25][26][27] continuously connect or disconnect themselves to the grid and change the dynamic situation of the grid. The protection of a smart grid will be more intensive and extremely complicated in presence of fluctuations and a quite long time consuming algorithm without providing optimum results, is not able to follow the instantaneous state of the grid therefore the online/offline protection scheme based on such algorithms would result in mal-operation and serious damages.…”
Section: Analytical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A year later, a strategy in terms of planning scope for future DG installations was proposed in [54] to avoid protection miscoordination which traditionally requires frequent modifications in relay settings. This strategy avoids the frequent setting modifications by incorporating constraints in a linear programming problem which is capable to ensure protection coordination for different DG sizes.…”
Section: Directional Overcurrent Relaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the above strategy which is formulated as a NLP, more recently, the authors in [54] had to focus on future DG planning scenarios and formulated a linear programming problem. It had a simplex algorithm with application of FCL which can identify a set of optimum relay settings which is effective for every potential new DG installation.…”
Section: Mathematical Algorithm Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(iv) Changing the available protective devices or installing the new ones such as breakers, re-closers, or distance/directional relays that are not usually used in DN is proposed in other works. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] Distance protection as common practice for transmission line protection is investigated in Huang et al 18 In Tsimtsios et al, 19 a forward distance element is enabled in each relay to protect the main line segment, while a reverse distance element is enabled in each relay for protecting the adjacent buses and laterals. The method is suitable for different fault/system conditions, avoiding the need for adaptive protection schemes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%