Photons Plus Ultrasound: Imaging and Sensing 2021 2021
DOI: 10.1117/12.2580696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plano-concave microresonator sensors for photoacoustic imaging: optical sensitivity maximization using transfer matrix model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have identified two main parameters that determine the performance of high-Q ultrasound sensors: We fabricated a series of PCMR sensors using a low-absorption material such as fused silica, and a variable mirror reflectivity that rendered values of the resonator Q-factor between 10 3 and 10 6 (up to 1000x higher than previously achieved with planar FP sensors). The measured optical sensitivity, which represents the sensitivity of the sensor to a change in optical thickness and is defined by the Q-factor, was in good agreement with theoretical predictions obtained by the ABCD model simulations [4]. However, although higher Q factor, and thus higher optical sensitivity, than the planar FP sensors was achieved with the PCMR design, it was observed that the noise was also higher.…”
Section: Limiting Factorssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We have identified two main parameters that determine the performance of high-Q ultrasound sensors: We fabricated a series of PCMR sensors using a low-absorption material such as fused silica, and a variable mirror reflectivity that rendered values of the resonator Q-factor between 10 3 and 10 6 (up to 1000x higher than previously achieved with planar FP sensors). The measured optical sensitivity, which represents the sensitivity of the sensor to a change in optical thickness and is defined by the Q-factor, was in good agreement with theoretical predictions obtained by the ABCD model simulations [4]. However, although higher Q factor, and thus higher optical sensitivity, than the planar FP sensors was achieved with the PCMR design, it was observed that the noise was also higher.…”
Section: Limiting Factorssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Since this noise component is proportional to optical sensitivity, it is significantly higher for the PCMRs than the FP planar sensors due to the higher Q-factors of the former. The phase noise became dominant (over shot noise and RIN) when Q>5·10 4 , for a laser linewidth of 20 kHz. As a result, the NEP was limited to tens of Pascals, a factor of 2 lower than planar FP sensors.…”
Section: Limiting Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Other methods allow predicting the transmitted or reflected field in certain conditions, enabling calculating ITFs in those conditions. For example, the well-known Airy Function [ 16 ] can predict the ITF if the radius of curvature (ROC) of the spherical mirror of the PCMR matches the curvature of the wavefront of the beam [ 17 ]. In these conditions, the beam propagation is analogous to that of a plane wave in a planar Fabry-Perot (FP) etalon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%