PLANT CARBON–NUTRIENT INTERACTIONS CONTROL CO₂EXCHANGE IN ALASKAN WET SEDGE TUNDRA ECOSYSTEMS

Abstract

We explored the long‐term (8‐yr) effects of separate field manipulations of temperature and nutrient availability on carbon balance in wet sedge tundra near the Arctic Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) site at Toolik Lake, Alaska. Our goals were (1) to assess the relative importance of chronic warming (with field greenhouses) and increased N and P availability (by fertilization) in controlling gross ecosystem photosynthesis, ecosystem respiration (plant plus heterotrophic respiration), and ultimately ecosystem C balance; and (2) to attempt to partition ecosystem responses to these treatments between plant and soil contributions. We present results of the effects of these manipulations on whole‐system CO2 exchange over seasonal and diel cycles, and on nonrhizosphere soil microbial respiration using in situ soil incubations. Wet sedge control plots were, at best, a weak sink for carbon even during the peak growing season. Chronic nutrient additions of N + P shifted wet sedge carbon balance to a strong sink throughout the growing season; nutrient availability regulated seasonal and diel CO2 exchanges in these two wet sedge ecosystems. The N + P plots had significantly higher photosynthesis and ecosystem respiration in spite of the unanticipated effect of ∼30% reduction in thaw depth in these plots, apparently due to a twofold increase in litter accumulation insulating the soil surface and/or possible shading from greater plant cover in these plots. These results highlighted the prevailing importance of nutrient–carbon interactions in controlling ecosystem processes and ecosystem C balance in arctic tundra. In contrast, warming had only subtle effects on CO2 exchanges. Increased temperatures in the warmed plots had little effect on instantaneous rates of photosynthesis or respiration. After eight years of chronic warming with an average 5.6°C higher air temperature over the growing season and a 40–200% increase in net N mineralization rate, it was surprising that warming did not have more profound effects on CO2 exchange and plant cover. If there were an effect of warming, increased temperatures might cause early canopy development and lengthen the growing season, rather than directly affect instantaneous rates of photosynthesis. Based on photosynthesis–light response curves developed from the early‐ and late‐season diel measurements, we demonstrated that the main effect of warming was to accelerate the development of the canopy early in the season. By midseason, however, there were no significant differences in C exchange between warmed and control plots. Perhaps the most important and novel result emerging from this study is the prevailing importance of plant C exchange, not soil processes, in driving ecosystem C fluxes. First, nonrhizosphere soil microbial respiration as estimated CO2 flux from in situ soil incubations was a small fraction of whole‐system respiration and did not vary among treatments. This suggests that anaerobic conditions or some other factor may limit soil microbial respiration more than do t...

Terrestrial carbon-cycle feedback to climate warming: experimental evidence on plant regulation and impacts of biofuel feedstock harvest

“…Other studies also showed an increase or no change in NEP under experimental warming (Johnson et al 2000;Marchand et al 2004;Luo 2007) temperature is less critical than other plant and ecosystem processes, such as shifted plant and microbial species composition (Peñuelas et al 2004(Peñuelas et al , 2007Zhang et al 2005;Harte et al 2006), changes in phenology and extension of growing seasons (Nemanti et al 2003;Cleland et al 2007;Sherry et al 2007), and altered nitrogen uptake and use efficiency (Rustad et al 2001;Melillo et al 2002;An et al 2005), in regulating terrestrial feedback to climate change.…”

Warming effects on permafrost ecosystem carbon fluxes associated with plant nutrients

“…), partly because of the poor understanding of the role of nutrients in regulating ecosystem C dynamics in permafrost zones under warming scenarios (Johnson et al. , Keuper et al. ).…”

Effects of climate variability on carbon sequestration among adjacent wet sedge tundra and moist tussock tundra ecosystems

“…Recent observations report that thermal profiles of permafrost and northern latitude temperature records have risen 2°–4°C across northern Alaska and Canada during the last few decades [ Lachenbruch and Marshall , 1986; Oechel et al , 1993; Osterkamp and Romanovsky , 1999]. This change in temperature will eventually affect the hydrology and thermal regime as well as feedback processes of Arctic tundra ecosystems which will ultimately influence the direction and magnitude of the carbon budget of the Arctic tundra region [ Tieszen et al , 1980; Kane et al , 1991; Chapin and Shaver , 1996; Johnson et al , 1996, 2000; Oechel et al , 2000b; Chapin et al , 2005].…”