“…Preliminary results indicate positive overall effects of retention of structural elements for forest biodiversity but also high variability among taxa and landscape settings; further, our findings suggest high potential for optimizing the integration of retention into management practice. The first ConFoBi publications described technical and methodological advances for quantifying forest structures; for example, we found a high potential for optimizing the quality in reconstruction of 3D forest models from aerial images based on drones (Frey, Kovach, Stemmler, & Koch, ), showed how the abundance and diversity of tree‐related microhabitats can be predicted with readily available forest attributes (Asbeck, Pyttel, Frey, & Bauhus, ), recorded a lichen species new for Germany (Wirth, Tønsberg, Reif, & Stevenson, ), optimized the trap design to capture flying arthropods (Knuff, Winiger, Klein, Segelbacher, & Staab, ), and showed that the occurrence of specialist herbivore communities might be best explained by plant species composition rather than the abiotic environment (Knuff, Staab, Frey, Helbach, & Klein, ). Based on meta‐analyses, ConFoBi researchers confirmed that crown‐damaged trees improve nesting opportunities for cavity‐nesting birds (Gutzat & Dormann, ) and that woodpeckers select cavitiesby relative rather than absolute tree size (Basile, Mikusinski, & Storch, ), but found that bird guilds are affected differently by forestry measures including retention, according to their life history, biome, and forest type (Basile, Mikusinski, & Storch, ).…”