2021 International Conference on Automation, Control and Mechatronics for Industry 4.0 (ACMI) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/acmi53878.2021.9528179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant Disease Detection Based on YOLOv3 and YOLOv4

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a previous work [7] by the same authors of this article, it was found that over the years, various CNN models have been considered in the literature for the tasks of plant identification and plant disease detection. Given the results reported in [15], [16] and [17], it was concluded that YOLOv3 or YOLOv4 would be the best option to consider when developing a mobile application to detect the development stages of wild flowers and plants. These models are fast, require relatively little processing capacity and allow results to be obtained in real time.…”
Section: Computer Vision Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a previous work [7] by the same authors of this article, it was found that over the years, various CNN models have been considered in the literature for the tasks of plant identification and plant disease detection. Given the results reported in [15], [16] and [17], it was concluded that YOLOv3 or YOLOv4 would be the best option to consider when developing a mobile application to detect the development stages of wild flowers and plants. These models are fast, require relatively little processing capacity and allow results to be obtained in real time.…”
Section: Computer Vision Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This component is responsible for feature extraction, which is the process of transforming data into numerical values. In YOLOv4, the neck component uses Path Aggregation Network (PAN) [17] to extract feature maps, while YOLOv3 uses Feature Pyramid Extraction (FPN). Finally, the head component consists of applying anchor boxes to the feature map extracted by PAN.…”
Section: Yolov4 E Yolov4-tinymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One-stage detector-based plant disease detection algorithms mainly comprise YoLo [26], SSD [27], and RetinaNet [28]. A one-stage detector accomplishes the classification and localization of plant disease targets in a network and extracts features directly from the network for plant disease category and location prediction.…”
Section: One-stage Detectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TL-SE-ResNeXt-101 model based on migration learning and residual networks proposed by Wang [46] has a mAP value of 47.37% when the input image size is 224 × 224. Shill and Rahman [47] proposed an accurate plant disease detection model based on YOLOv4, which is named as M_YOLOv4 in this table, and the mAP and F 1 -scores of the model are 55.45% and 56.00%, respectively. The F 1 -score of YOLOX-ASSANano proposed in this work is 56.11%, and the mAP of our model is 3.41% higher than that of M_YOLOv4, reaching 58.86% as the best disease detection result, which indicates the greater usefulness of our model in real agricultural settings.…”
Section: Comparison Experiments On Plantdocmentioning
confidence: 99%