Plant diversity in herbal tea and its traditional knowledge in Qingtian County, Zhejiang Province, China

Abstract

Herbal teas composed of locally occurring plant species have long been used as the primary form of health care in Qingtian County, Zhejiang Province, China. However, large-scale emigration overseas and an aging population threaten the conservation of traditional knowledge of these herbal teas. Traditional knowledge about the plants used for these herbal teas is not well documented in Qingtian, despite their widespread use. The aim of this study was to assess the plant-cultural diversity of plants used as herbal teas, and to point out the prospective value of herbal teas used by Qingtian people. This study was conducted using semi-structured interviews, as well as field and market surveys. Forty-three local informants were interviewed. We recorded plant resources, plant parts used, local names, and medicinal uses. Quantitative ethnobotanical indices, including cognitive salience (CS), frequency of citation (FC), index of informant consensus (F ic ) and use value (UV), were calculated to analyze the level of representativeness and relative importance of plants used in herbal teas. One hundred and twenty-nine species belonging to 75 families and 113 genera were reported to be used in herbal tea, with Compositae being the richest family. Whole plants are most commonly used to make herbal teas (66.7%). In this study, informants reported that 92.2% of plant species used in herbal teas are wild. The most utilized herbal preparation form is dry/fresh. Informants reported that herbal teas are used to treat 31 ailments. Our results show that the highest representativeness, based on CS and FC, was recorded for species Actinidia eriantha . Based on UV, the top five most used species are Goodyera schlechtendaliana , Plantago asiatica , Prunella vulgaris , Lophatherum gracile and Leonurus japonicus . The highest F ic was cited for dental medicine. This study helps document the status of current herbal teas in Qingtian. The use value and traditional knowledge of herbal teas have provided basic data for further research focused on bioactivity studies and sustainable utilization of the most important species.

Is it the plants we know that we use? Unraveling the determining factors of ethnobotanical knowledge in a rural community in Central Mexico

“…Another possible explanation is the cultural relevance of trees and shrubs as firewood in the community, which are the principal vegetable elements used locally in the preparation of several traditional 2017), this can be attributed to the fact that these morphological structures have greater succulence with respect to the rest of the plant parts and are directly related to food and health care, which are the main social needs that require attention in the community. The outstanding importance and presence of medicinal plants could be related to the lack of coverage of the health service in the El Zapote community, since it has been documented that the absence of public health services or the remoteness of this assistance favors the role of plants in the maintenance of traditional medical practices (Liu et al 2020;Rangel-Landa et al 2017). Overall, a great proportion (40.76%) of these medicinal plants was recorded in homegardens, which explains the relevance of this place as a driver to the local reservoir of native and exotic species in the community (Additional File 1).…”

Anti-inflammatory and antiviral activities of flavone C-glycosides of Lophatherum gracile for COVID-19

“…It has been used to make facial masks, skin cream, and other healthcare products ( Lai et al, 2021 , Liu et al, 2022 ). L. gracile is the main ingredient of various teas in China, including Guangdong and Wong Lo Kat ( He et al, 2011 , Liu et al, 2022 , Liu et al, 2020 ). L. gracile has a long history in the treatment of fever and inflammatory conditions ( Diaz, Jeong, Lee, Khoo, & Koyyalamudi, 2012 ).…”

The Nolan Index: A Quantitative Measure of List Similarities

“…Examples of the diverse array of applications in ethnobiology include comparative studies of indigenous populations': ethnobotanical knowledge (e.g. Amjad et al 2017;Kayani et al 2015;Liu et al 2020;Ludwinsky et al 2021;Porcher et al 2022;Sivasankari, Anandharaj and Gunasekaran 2014), wild food plant uses (e.g. Belichenko et al 2021;Prūse et al 2021), medicinal plant uses (e.g.…”