2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-019-04345-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant–plant interactions influence phylogenetic diversity at multiple spatial scales in a semi-arid mountain rangeland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate nurse plant effects with respect to land abandonment ages (i.e., across three sites), we considered two spatial scales: (1) the plot scale and (2) the vegetation‐patch scale (Pashirzad et al, 2019 ; Soliveres et al, 2012 , 2014 ) (Table 1 ; see details in Appendix S1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To evaluate nurse plant effects with respect to land abandonment ages (i.e., across three sites), we considered two spatial scales: (1) the plot scale and (2) the vegetation‐patch scale (Pashirzad et al, 2019 ; Soliveres et al, 2012 , 2014 ) (Table 1 ; see details in Appendix S1 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the same number of quadrats were sampled in open areas adjacent to these nurse plants (hereafter Stipa patch, Artemisia patch, and Open patch) (see details in Appendix S1 ). To properly assess the nurse plant effects across different spatial scales, it is important that the vegetation‐patch scale is located within larger spatial scale (Pashirzad et al, 2019 ; Soliveres et al, 2012 ). The number of samples and patch cover (i.e., 0.5 × 0.5 m) at the vegetation‐patch scale were obtained through assessing species‐area curves and previous groundbreaking references that advise a range of 20 to 30 samples with 0.5 × 0.5 m cover beneath the canopies of nurse species as appropriate replication and sample size for vegetation sampling beneath grasses and dwarf shrubs (Soliveres et al, 2012 , 2014 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evolutionary history has become of particular interest to community ecologists in the last two decades. The field of community evolution has developed as a means of exploring the factors distributing biodiversity across regions at all geographical scales via ecological and evolutionary mechanisms, primarily involving tests of the influences of ecological interactions, such as competition and facilitation, of the abiotic environment as a filter, and of random processes such as dispersal (Emerson & Gillespie, 2008;Kraft, Cornwell, Webb, & Ackerly, 2007;Pashirzad, Ejtehadi, Vaezi, & Shefferson, 2019).…”
Section: How Does Evolutionary History Influence Community Ecosystmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evolutionary history has become of particular interest to community ecologists in the last two decades. The field of community evolution has developed as a means of exploring the factors distributing biodiversity across regions at all geographical scales via ecological and evolutionary mechanisms, primarily involving tests of the influences of ecological interactions, such as competition and facilitation, of the abiotic environment as a filter, and of random processes such as dispersal (Emerson & Gillespie, ; Kraft, Cornwell, Webb, & Ackerly, ; Pashirzad, Ejtehadi, Vaezi, & Shefferson, ). Recent research has tied evolutionary processes both to community diversity and ecosystem functioning, finding that natural selection can cause dramatic changes in plant community productivity and implying that speciation and extinction may have similarly dramatic effects on ecosystem functioning in general (van Moorsel et al ).…”
Section: Major Themes and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%