2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2002.00709.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant response to solar ultraviolet‐B radiation in a southern South American Sphagnum peatland

Abstract: Summary1 Plant growth and pigmentation of the moss Sphagnum magellanicum and the vascular plants Empetrum rubrum , Nothofagus antarctica and Tetroncium magellanicum were measured under near-ambient (90% of ambient) and reduced (20%) ultraviolet-B (UV-B) radiation for three growing seasons in a Sphagnum peatland in Tierra del Fuego, Argentina (55 ° S). 2 Reduction of solar UV-B increased height growth but decreased volumetric density in S. magellanicum so that biomass production was not influenced during the 3 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
59
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
6
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These values are within the range of annual height increments reported on S. angustifolium in Québec (Moore 1989) and other Sphagnum species measured in high latitude locations Aerts et al 1992;Gehrke 1998; Abbreviations for climatic variables defined in Table 2 Standard deviations are indicated in parentheses a The CS615 was not calibrated for this soil type, and thus, reported values are relative estimates of volumetric water content Searles et al 2002;Sonesson et al 2002;Dorrepaal et al 2004;Gunnarsson 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…These values are within the range of annual height increments reported on S. angustifolium in Québec (Moore 1989) and other Sphagnum species measured in high latitude locations Aerts et al 1992;Gehrke 1998; Abbreviations for climatic variables defined in Table 2 Standard deviations are indicated in parentheses a The CS615 was not calibrated for this soil type, and thus, reported values are relative estimates of volumetric water content Searles et al 2002;Sonesson et al 2002;Dorrepaal et al 2004;Gunnarsson 2005).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Changes in chlorophyll have been observed in some species but are not a consistent response to natural variations in UV−B expo− sure, although they have previously been observed in Arctic bryophytes in response to enhanced UV−B radiation (Gehrke 1999;Searles et al 2001;Caldwell et al 2003). No change in chlorophyll concentration was observed as a result of seasonal changes in UV−B radiation in either the South American Sphagnum magellanicum (Searles et al 2002) or two Antarctic bryophytes studied by Newsham et al (2002). Carotenoid synthesis is known to be induced by exposure to UV−B radiation (Cockell and Knowland 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…the daily period of high PAR and UV exposure (Krause et al, 2001). In several reports (Liu et al, 2005;Lovelock et at., 1992;Lud et al, 2001;Rousseaux et al, 2004;Searles et at., 2002), not all tested plant species responded with a reduction in the level of UV-B absorbing compounds, when solar UV-B was attenuated by means of filters. The significance of these different responses among species is unclear at present.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…on the moss Sphagnum magellanicum (Searles et al, 2002) and crop plants such as oat (Avena sativa L.) and lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) (Rousseaux et al, 2004), cannot be generalized among species. Substantial inhibition of dry matter productivity by solar UV-B has been shown in a number of reports (see Day and Neale, 2002, for review;Liu et al, 2005;Zavala and Ravetta, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%