2020
DOI: 10.12928/telkomnika.v18i2.14062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant species identification based on leaf venation features using SVM

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to identify plant species using leaf venation features. Leaf venation features were obtained through the extraction of leaf venation features. The leaf image segmentation was performed to obtain the binary image of the leaf venation which is then determined the branching point and ending point. From these points, the extraction of leaf venation feature was performed by calculating the value of straightness, a different angle, length ratio, scale projection, skeleton length, number … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Again in a study based on leaf vein patterns, different classification methods were compared and neural networks were shown to perform best, followed by support vector machines (SVM) [4]. SVM can be seen in similar studies, 32 species classified and the average accuracy obtained in testing data is 82.67% [5]. In another study a hybrid model is used by SVM the proposed model yields to improve the identification rate up to 98.9% and 93.3% for both Flavia and Swedish dataset respectively [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Again in a study based on leaf vein patterns, different classification methods were compared and neural networks were shown to perform best, followed by support vector machines (SVM) [4]. SVM can be seen in similar studies, 32 species classified and the average accuracy obtained in testing data is 82.67% [5]. In another study a hybrid model is used by SVM the proposed model yields to improve the identification rate up to 98.9% and 93.3% for both Flavia and Swedish dataset respectively [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…SVM works very well on high-dimensional data sets [23]. This method uses a kernel technique that maps original data from the originating dimension to another relatively higher dimension [24]. In the NN method, the training process studies all training data, whereas SVM only studies selected data used in classification [25].…”
Section: Support Vector Machinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [21], a modified local binary pattern was proposed to extract texture features, and a simple nearest neighbor classifier was performed for classification, to decrease the intra-class variation the clustering was exploited in order to group symmetric leaf samples; the results prove that considering texture features alone is not sufficient. In [22], the authors propose to classify plant species using 19 leaf venation features using a support vector machine (SVM) with an RBF kernel. In [23], the authors propose to identify plant leaf based on visual features using different artificial intelligence techniques such as artificial neural networks, the naive Bayes algorithm, the random forest algorithm, the K-nearest neighbor (KNN), and the support vector machine (SVM).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%