2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00334-017-0638-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plant storage in Neolithic southeast Europe: synthesis of the archaeological and archaeobotanical evidence from Serbia

Abstract: This paper presents and evaluates the archaeobotanical and archaeological evidence of plant product storage from Early and Late Neolithic sites in Serbia, southeast Europe. The commonly stated and widely accepted archaeological evidence of storage in the region includes ceramic pots, clay bins and pits. However, as shown in our study, the archaeobotanical evidence does not always support the interpretation of these structures and objects as plant storage containers, as it is often of secondary origin and compo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Still, the grain was not likely to have been stored loose, and the use of textile or wood containers seems reasonable. This type of storage has been recurrently mentioned in several chronological/cultural contexts (e.g., [82][83][84]). At the medieval site of Tremona Castello (Switzerland), braided plant fibres were identified in a storage context, suggesting perishable containers were used to keep crops and protect them against the high humidity of the region [85].…”
Section: Storagementioning
confidence: 79%
“…Still, the grain was not likely to have been stored loose, and the use of textile or wood containers seems reasonable. This type of storage has been recurrently mentioned in several chronological/cultural contexts (e.g., [82][83][84]). At the medieval site of Tremona Castello (Switzerland), braided plant fibres were identified in a storage context, suggesting perishable containers were used to keep crops and protect them against the high humidity of the region [85].…”
Section: Storagementioning
confidence: 79%
“…The archaeological visibility of storage methods and stored goods varies widely, making it difficult to determine the character, organization and importance of storage within a specific context. For the prehistoric Balkans a range of different storage methods have been identified, but usually from indirect evidence, such as the discovery of large vessels, clay bins or subterranean features, and are usually interpreted from ethnographic analogies (Filipovi≤ et al 2018;Papaefthymiou-Papanthimou et al 2013).…”
Section: Storage Location and Containersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, research engaging with population dynamics, subsistence strategies, settlement practices, and responses to local and regional environmental and climatic change is thriving (e.g. Benecke et al 2013;Chapman & Souvatzi, 2020;Filipović et al 2017Filipović et al , 2018Gaastra et al 2018;Ivanova, 2012Ivanova, , 2020Ivanova et al 2018;Marić, 2013Marić, , 2015Marić, , 2017Müller, 2012;Orton, 2010Orton, , 2017Orton et al 2016;Porčić et al 2016;Porčić, 2011Porčić, , 2012bPorčić, , 2020Silva & Vander Linden, 2017). It is also worth noting that several major, modern excavation and survey projects of Neolithic-Chalcolithic sites in the Balkans, such as Okolište (Bosnia), Uivar (Romania), and Vinča (Serbia) (Draşovean et al 2017;Schier, 2014b;Tasić et al 2016), have yet to document substantial metal objects or any clear evidence for metal production.…”
Section: Scholarship In Early Balkan Metallurgymentioning
confidence: 99%