Pueblos Indígenas, Plantas Y Mercados
DOI: 10.7761/9789738863279_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plants, property and trade

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A difference in the torus covering factor distribution between different types of AGN would also explain why the average hard X-ray spectrum of Compton-thin Seyfert 2s shows a larger reflection component than that of Seyfert 1s and Seyfert 1.5s (Ricci et al 2011). A similar result was found by Brightman & Ueda (2012): studying high-redshift AGN in the Chandra Deep Field South they found that more obscured objects appear to have tori with larger covering factors, although they did not find a clear luminosity dependence.…”
Section: Luminosity-dependent Unification Of Agnsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A difference in the torus covering factor distribution between different types of AGN would also explain why the average hard X-ray spectrum of Compton-thin Seyfert 2s shows a larger reflection component than that of Seyfert 1s and Seyfert 1.5s (Ricci et al 2011). A similar result was found by Brightman & Ueda (2012): studying high-redshift AGN in the Chandra Deep Field South they found that more obscured objects appear to have tori with larger covering factors, although they did not find a clear luminosity dependence.…”
Section: Luminosity-dependent Unification Of Agnsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…torus. However, this kind of studies are still very scarce (e.g., Rivers et al 2011;Brightman & Ueda 2012), besides being largely geometry-dependent. Studies of AGN in the mid-IR band performed using the clumpy torus formalism of Nenkova et al (2008) have shown that the number of clouds along the equator is N 0 ∼ 5 −10 ( Mor et al 2009).…”
Section: The Equatorial Column Density Of the Torusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of the 0.5-8 keV band is motivated by recent results on the number density of Compton-thick AGN in that spectral band by Brightman & Ueda (2012). They used the 4 Ms Chandra Deep Field South data in combination with the spectral models of Brightman & Nandra (2011), which account for Compton-scattering and the geometry of the circumnuclear material, to identify Compton-thick AGN to the flux limit f X (0.5−8 keV) ≈ 10 −16 erg s −1 cm −2 .…”
Section: Predictions On the Properties Of Compton-thick Agnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose to compare our model predictions with the observed cumulative number count distribution of Comptonthick sources rather than their fraction relative to the overall AGN population. This is to avoid any uncertainties in the determination of the number density as a function of flux of the overall AGN population with L X (2 − 10 keV) > 10 42 erg s −1 adopted by Brightman & Ueda (2012) to normalise the Compton-thick number counts. In the context of our model the fraction f CT ≈ 25% implied by the Brightman & Ueda (2012) results is consistent at the 95% confidence level with the observed fraction of Comptonthick sources in the SWIFT/BAT AGN sample in the local Universe (see Figure 3).…”
Section: Predictions On the Properties Of Compton-thick Agnmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation