2015
DOI: 10.1024/2235-0977/a000068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Planungsleistungen bei Grundschülern mit ADHS und LRS

Abstract: Exekutive Funktionen (EF) sind kognitive Steuerungsmechanismen, die zielgerichtetes Verhalten ermöglichen. EF werden sowohl im Alltag als auch beim Lernen benötigt und stellen in der Diagnostik eine wichtige Beschreibungsdimension dar. Exekutive Dysfunktionen werden als ein kognitives Kernsymptom der Aufmerksamkeitsdefizit-/Hyperaktivitätsstörung (ADHS) gesehen. Planungsleistungen (inkl. Handlungsplanung) zählen neben dem Arbeitsgedächtnis, der Inhibitionskontrolle und der kognitiven Flexibilität zu den wichti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, parents reported more Inhibition difficulties (behavioral domain) with DG participants, whereas teachers reported more difficulties in Shift (emotional domain) among students in the DG. Although our findings from parents were consistent with the small number of past studies that examined EF of children and adolescents with dyslexia (Gioia et al, 2002b;Locascio et al, 2010;Schöfl et al, 2014), we also identified additional differences in teacher-reported EF concerns between the DG and TD groups. These findings help to provide new insights into patterns of teacher-reported EF concerns in children and adolescents with dyslexia.…”
Section: Parent and Teacher Reports Of Efsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, parents reported more Inhibition difficulties (behavioral domain) with DG participants, whereas teachers reported more difficulties in Shift (emotional domain) among students in the DG. Although our findings from parents were consistent with the small number of past studies that examined EF of children and adolescents with dyslexia (Gioia et al, 2002b;Locascio et al, 2010;Schöfl et al, 2014), we also identified additional differences in teacher-reported EF concerns between the DG and TD groups. These findings help to provide new insights into patterns of teacher-reported EF concerns in children and adolescents with dyslexia.…”
Section: Parent and Teacher Reports Of Efsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Similar to findings of Gioia and colleagues (2002b), Schöfl et al (2014) found that 17 German-speaking children with dyslexia (compared with a control group without dyslexia) were rated by parents as having more cognitive regulation difficulties with working memory and planningorganization. Most recently, Smith-Spark et al (2016) showed that 31 English-speaking adults with dyslexia selfreported more frequent EF problems, with these difficulties centering on metacognitive processes (working memory, planning, task monitoring, and organization), rather than on the regulation of emotion and behavior.…”
Section: Evaluating Ef For Students With Dyslexiasupporting
confidence: 85%
“…That is, they seem to maintain generalized deficits in executive functions of daily life similar to the few studies conducted with behavioral scales (e.g. Locascio et al, 2010;Schöfl et al, 2014;Smith-Spark et al, 2016;Spicer, 2015). Zelazo & Müller (2002) Our data, although not statistically significant, point out that adolescents with dyslexia make more negative descriptions of themselves than their parents do of their executive functioning.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Likewise, in the study of Schöfl, Kloo, & Kaufmann (2014) according to parent ratings of 17 German-speaking children with dyslexia showed higher levels of deficiencies in working memory and planning, and organization than healthy controls. Also, by using parent version, Spicer (2015) found more generalized and severe deficiencies in executive functions in English-speaking students with reading disabilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation