2012
DOI: 10.1111/jvp.12023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasma disposition and milk excretion of eprinomectin following pour‐on administration in lactating donkeys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eprinomectin (EPM) administered as a pour-on preparation and at a dose rate rec-comended for cattle is effective against D. arnfieldi infection in donkeys (Veneziano et al , 2011). The low level of excretion of EPM in donkey milk, which is lower than the maximum residue limit in bovine milk (20 µg/kg) (WHO/FAO, 1999), led to take into account the use of EPM in lactating donkeys at cattle dosage of 0.5 mg/kg body weight, thus avoiding any risk to food safety (Gokbulut et al , 2012). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eprinomectin (EPM) administered as a pour-on preparation and at a dose rate rec-comended for cattle is effective against D. arnfieldi infection in donkeys (Veneziano et al , 2011). The low level of excretion of EPM in donkey milk, which is lower than the maximum residue limit in bovine milk (20 µg/kg) (WHO/FAO, 1999), led to take into account the use of EPM in lactating donkeys at cattle dosage of 0.5 mg/kg body weight, thus avoiding any risk to food safety (Gokbulut et al , 2012). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pharmacokinetic parameters of pour‐on EPM have been recently studied in donkeys (Gokbulut et al ., , ), and the plasma disposition of EPM in horses in our study differs from that in donkeys. Subsequently, the terminal half‐life ( T 1/2 : 1.37 days), plasma availability (AUC: 17.69 ng·d/mL) and persistence (MRT: 2.93 days) of EPM are significantly lower in horses, compared with those observed in donkeys ( T 1/2 : 5.64 days, AUC: 73.39 ng·d/mL and MRT: 8.98 days).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although the pour‐on formulation of endectocides was administered at higher dosage, their plasma availabilities via the topical route were much lower compared with per os or subcutaneous administration due to their poor or limited absorption through the skin, as previously reported in different equine (Gokbulut et al ., , , ) and ruminant species (Alvinerie et al ., ,b; Dupuy et al ., , ; Laffont et al ., ; Sallovitz et al ., ; Gokbulut et al ., , ) and as recently reviewed by McKellar and Gokbulut (). Our data obtained in horses were consistent with previous findings, with significantly higher C max (25.84 ng/mL) and greater AUC (80.91 ng·d/mL) values of per os IVM compared with those of pour‐on EPM ( C max : 5.03 ng/mL and AUC: 17.69 ng·d/mL).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Eprinomectin also has high efficacy for many endectoparasites and can be applied to milking cows because of the low level of drug excretion in milk (Gokbulut et al 2012;Mason et al 2012;Reist et al 2011;Schoop et al 1996aSchoop et al , 1996bWilliams et al 1997). Larvicidal efficacy of eprinomectin against ectoparasitic flies occurring on cattle dung was examined by Floate et al (2001), but its effects on nontarget coprophagous insects have been investigated in only a few papers in a limited number of countries M. Iwasa (&) Á M. Sugitani Laboratory of Entomology, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Inada-cho, Obihiro, Hokkaido 080-8555, Japan e-mail: iwasa@obihiro.ac.jp (Floate et al 2002;Lumaret et al 2005;Wardhaugh et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%