2001
DOI: 10.1159/000059392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasma Interleukin-1β, Prolactin, ACTH and Corticosterone Responses to Endotoxin after Damage of the Anterior Hypothalamic Area

Abstract: This report concerns the use of an animal model described by us [J Submicrosc Cytol Pathol 1995;27:83–89] to investigate neural and endocrine sites for endotoxin (ENDO, E. coli 055:B5, 200 µg/100 g body weight in saline intravenously) effects on immunomodulatory hormone and cytokine release. Plasma interleukin-1β (IL-1β), prolactin (PRL), ACTH and corticosterone responses to ENDO after neurotoxic damage of neurons residing in the anterior hypothalamic area (AHA) were studied in freely behaving male rats. Excit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present results are in accordance with a recent study showing decreased plasma prolactin concentrations following immune activation (De Laurentiis et al 2002); however there are multiple other studies reporting either increased plasma prolactin concentrations (Rettori et al 1994, Phelps et al 2001, Gonzalez et al 2004 or no change in prolactin (Abreu et al 1994) following immune activation. The major difference between these conflicting results is the route of LPS administration or, in the case of Table 1.…”
Section: Hypothalamic Ca Systemssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present results are in accordance with a recent study showing decreased plasma prolactin concentrations following immune activation (De Laurentiis et al 2002); however there are multiple other studies reporting either increased plasma prolactin concentrations (Rettori et al 1994, Phelps et al 2001, Gonzalez et al 2004 or no change in prolactin (Abreu et al 1994) following immune activation. The major difference between these conflicting results is the route of LPS administration or, in the case of Table 1.…”
Section: Hypothalamic Ca Systemssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In contrast, in studies using high doses of LPS given i.v. (Rettori et al 1994, Phelps et al 2001 or LPS given i.c.v. (Gonzalez et al 2004), LPS injection resulted in increased serum prolactin concentrations.…”
Section: Hypothalamic Ca Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%