1957
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.106.874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasma Losses by Fast Electrons in Thin Films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

28
1,434
0
23

Year Published

1991
1991
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,832 publications
(1,485 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
28
1,434
0
23
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, in 1957, Ritchie reported a theoretical study of electron energy loss in thin films, describing surface-localized plasmon modes [28,29]. This prediction was experimentally proven a few years later by Powell and Swan using reflection EELS, which pioneered the experimental research on surface plasmons [30].…”
Section: Fundamental Properties Of Plasmons Probed By Electron Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, in 1957, Ritchie reported a theoretical study of electron energy loss in thin films, describing surface-localized plasmon modes [28,29]. This prediction was experimentally proven a few years later by Powell and Swan using reflection EELS, which pioneered the experimental research on surface plasmons [30].…”
Section: Fundamental Properties Of Plasmons Probed By Electron Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 Following those pioneering studies, electron beams have revealed many of the properties of plasmons through energy-loss and cathodoluminescence spectroscopies, which benefit from the impressive combination of high spatial and spectral resolutions that is currently available in electron microscopes and that allows mapping plasmon modes in metallic nanoparticles and other nanostructures of practical interest. [3][4][5] However, plasmon creation rates are generally low, thus rendering multiple excitations of a single plasmon mode by a single electron extremely unlikely.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These Sommerfeld-Zenneck waves (SZW) are similar to SPPs, the difference that being the condition for SZW is ε i (ω) |ε r (ω)| (where ε i and ε r are the imaginary and real parts of the dielectric function, respectively), whereas for SPPs it is ε i (ω) |ε r (ω)| [38], i.e., ε r must be of different signs for the two media for SPP, which is not the case for SZW. However, despite this, both fields existed separately for a long time with their common linkages not becoming clear until 1956 and 1957, first through the work of Pines [10] and then Ritchie [28], who defined plasmons (in general) and surface plasmons (specifically), respectively.…”
Section: Historical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, resonances had been considered to be totally [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] and plasma physics [6,10,[12][13][14][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] from 1857 to the present day, discussed in detail in Section 1.3 of the main text.…”
Section: Historical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%