2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.126744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plasma spraying of mullite and pore formers for thermal insulating applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wherever relevant, limitations of specific thermal spray variants are highlighted to emphasize the fact that not all thermal spray techniques maybe suited to deposit every material of interest and vice-versa. [17] 4.1 Thermal spray coatings for proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolysers…”
Section: Thermal Spray Coatings For Electrolysersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Wherever relevant, limitations of specific thermal spray variants are highlighted to emphasize the fact that not all thermal spray techniques maybe suited to deposit every material of interest and vice-versa. [17] 4.1 Thermal spray coatings for proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolysers…”
Section: Thermal Spray Coatings For Electrolysersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, pore-formers are also used to intentionally introduce porosity, particularly in thermal sprayed ceramic coatings. [17] Table 2 seeks to provide a detailed summary of the numerous examples of thermal spray feedstock materials and spraying routes used to manufacture coatings for water-splitting leading to hydrogen production. Details are also condensed in a graphical form in Figure 21 for all the seven electrolyser types that have been reviewed herein.…”
Section: Traditional Feedstock Materials Coating Design and Post-proc...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations