2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2019.07.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plastic contact of self-affine surfaces: Persson’s theory versus discrete dislocation plasticity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The polymers used in our study are semi-crystalline, and since the crystalline domains are of micrometer size and have different mechanical properties than the amorphous regions, inhomogeneous flow on the microscale occurs during plastic flow. How plastic flow generate surface roughness for metallic-like crystalline solids was shown recently in a very interesting study by Venugopalan et al [19]. In the calculations we have used the measured surface roughness power spectra of the sandblasted polymer balls, penetration hardness from the conical indenter (see Table 1) and the Young's elastic modulus from the literature [23] (E = 0.7, 2.1, 1.2, 1.25 and 2.0 GPa for PTFE, PC, nylon, UHMWPE and PP, respectively).…”
Section: Asperity Deformations and Contact Areamentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The polymers used in our study are semi-crystalline, and since the crystalline domains are of micrometer size and have different mechanical properties than the amorphous regions, inhomogeneous flow on the microscale occurs during plastic flow. How plastic flow generate surface roughness for metallic-like crystalline solids was shown recently in a very interesting study by Venugopalan et al [19]. In the calculations we have used the measured surface roughness power spectra of the sandblasted polymer balls, penetration hardness from the conical indenter (see Table 1) and the Young's elastic modulus from the literature [23] (E = 0.7, 2.1, 1.2, 1.25 and 2.0 GPa for PTFE, PC, nylon, UHMWPE and PP, respectively).…”
Section: Asperity Deformations and Contact Areamentioning
confidence: 83%
“…[5]), and was in fact used in the study presented in Ref. [19]. It is less clear how to include strain hardening in this approach.…”
Section: Asperity Deformations and Contact Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deshpande and co-workers [ 21 , 33 ] performed monotonic micro-sliding discrete dislocation plasticity (DDP) simulations to investigate the dislocation structure and surface behaviour under sliding. Nicola and co-workers [ 34 , 35 , 36 ] have also employed the DDP framework to understand the activity of dislocations under multi-asperity, self-affine contact, and the roughness (i.e., the height of the asperities) has been shown to play a key role in the development of plasticity in the subsurface. To the authors’ knowledge, there is no computational framework published for fretting fatigue using DDP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[27,28]. Several studies of surface roughness and plastic flow have been reported using microscopic (atomistic) models [29], or models inspired by atomic scale phenomena that control the nucleation and glide of the dislocations [30][31][32][33]. These models supply fundamental insight into the complex process of plastic flow, but are not easy to apply to practical systems involving inhomogeneous polycrystalline metals and alloys exhibiting surface roughness of many length scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%