1991
DOI: 10.1080/01418619108213939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Plastic deformation of single crystals of Ti3Al with D019structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
1
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
28
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The barrier strength of the a 2 lamellae apparently depends on their orientation with respect to the loading axis. This has been referred to the glide anisotropy of the a 2 -phase by considering the Schmid factor for [8,9]. The a 2 lamellae provide the highest glide resistance in this orientation.…”
Section: Isothermal Low Cycle Fatigue Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The barrier strength of the a 2 lamellae apparently depends on their orientation with respect to the loading axis. This has been referred to the glide anisotropy of the a 2 -phase by considering the Schmid factor for [8,9]. The a 2 lamellae provide the highest glide resistance in this orientation.…”
Section: Isothermal Low Cycle Fatigue Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, only one type of hai dislocation can glide on each f1 1 0 0g prism plane since only one of the three hai-type Burgers vectors is parallel to each prism plane. Basal slip is very coplanar and intense although the Peierls stress is clearly higher than for prismatic glide of the same dislocations [25,27]. Legros et al [36] revealed via their in situ TEM observation that the three types of hai dislocations form glissile networks on basal plane and the slip is confined to the plane, which leads to the very coplanar and intense glide.…”
Section: Factors Determining the Operating Slip Systemsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…There are three slip systems operating in a 2 -Ti 3 Al: (0 0 0 1)h1 1 2 0i basal slip, the f1 1 0 0gh1 1 2 0i prism slip and f1 1 2 1gh1 1 2 6i pyramidal slip [27]. When only the macroscopic nominal loading axis is considered, the Schmid factors for the three slip systems are 0, 0.5 and 0.42 respectively.…”
Section: Factors Determining the Operating Slip Systemsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Taking the observed slip plane of f2111g into consideration, the Burgers vector of dislocations should be parallel to < 2116 >. The f2111g < 2116 > slip system was previously reported to be operative in some other D0 19 -structured compounds [18][19][20][21]. Since only the dislocations caused by the pyramidal slip contain the c-component in their Burgers vector, they may play an important role to yield the ductility of this compound in its polycrystalline form.…”
Section: Deformation Behavior At B-orientationmentioning
confidence: 96%