2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1062-1458(02)00682-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis of all major randomised clinical trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
412
1
30

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 280 publications
(451 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
8
412
1
30
Order By: Relevance
“…diabetes) and/or procedures, 20,21 overall a sizable proportion of patients fulfiling these criteria did not receive GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockers. In addition, major variations across European hospitals in the use of GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockers were observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…diabetes) and/or procedures, 20,21 overall a sizable proportion of patients fulfiling these criteria did not receive GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockers. In addition, major variations across European hospitals in the use of GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockers were observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Boersama et al concluded that GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor use resulted in a decrease in 30 day mortality or MI, but noted a declining trend in benefit with increasing age, which was also demonstrated in community observational studies primarily as a result of increased bleeding. 15 One of the reasons for increased bleeding was inappropriate dosing, especially in patients with poor renal function. It appears that GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors can be useful in the elderly, especially when dosed appropriately.…”
Section: Glycoprotein Iib/iiia Inhibitors (Gp Iib/iiia)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The risk of bleeding with clopidogrel was similar to that observed with lowmolecular-weight heparin versus placebo (0.8% versus 0.5%) in the FRISC (Fragmin During Instability in Coronary Artery Disease) study 9 but lower than that observed in the trials of intravenous (2.4% versus 1.4%) or oral (4.1% versus 2.4%) glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. 4,10,11 Furthermore, several of the above treatments were given for relatively short periods of time (eg, 3 days to a few weeks), and the bleeding events were mainly counted during this period. Therefore, based on these indirect comparisons, the risk-benefit balance over time with clopidogrel is at least similar (and may even be better) to that seen with other agents proven to be effective in ACS.…”
Section: Yusuf Et Al Clopidogrel In Patients With Acs 969mentioning
confidence: 99%