2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.09.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Platform trials to overcome major shortcomings of traditional clinical trials in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis? Pros and cons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another aspect involves optimization of the selection of participants, for example enriching studies for patients harbouring known genetic polymorphisms that are associated with an accelerated disease course and adverse outcomes. Adopting new trial designs (for example, platform trials) to efficiently evaluate multiple drugs through adaptive randomization has been proposed in NASH 86 . However, unlike in oncology, platform trials are inherently more challenging to implement in a highly heterogeneous and slowly progressive condition such as NASH, in which molecular subtypes (suitable for specific targeted therapies) have not yet been defined and robust end points (for example, survival) generally do not apply.…”
Section: How Can We Improve Clinical Trials and Enhance Their Outputs?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another aspect involves optimization of the selection of participants, for example enriching studies for patients harbouring known genetic polymorphisms that are associated with an accelerated disease course and adverse outcomes. Adopting new trial designs (for example, platform trials) to efficiently evaluate multiple drugs through adaptive randomization has been proposed in NASH 86 . However, unlike in oncology, platform trials are inherently more challenging to implement in a highly heterogeneous and slowly progressive condition such as NASH, in which molecular subtypes (suitable for specific targeted therapies) have not yet been defined and robust end points (for example, survival) generally do not apply.…”
Section: How Can We Improve Clinical Trials and Enhance Their Outputs?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In doing so, we provide a comprehensive view on the design considerations, the developmental phase where PT might find better accommodation, the methodological aspects, as well as the operational and regulatory principles. This review will reflect part of the work conducted within a consortium of 36 private and public partners that have come together in a strategic partnership to deliver on the IMI (Innovative Medicines Initiative) proposal goals to advance the field of PT; the project is called EU Patient‐cEntric clinicAl tRial pLatforms (EU‐PEARL), which includes the preparation of a NASH integrated research platform (IRP) trial 9 …”
Section: Nash: a Burgeoning Yet Elusive Drug Development Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This review will reflect part of the work conducted within a consortium of 36 private and public partners that have come together in a strategic partnership to deliver on the IMI (Innovative Medicines Initiative) proposal goals to advance the field of PT; the project is called EU Patient-cEntric clinicAl tRial pLatforms (EU-PEARL), which includes the preparation of a NASH integrated research platform (IRP) trial. 9…”
Section: Na S H: a Burg Eoning Ye T Elus Ive Drug De Velopment Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hinsichtlich des letztgenannten Aspekts, den Veränderungen im Zeitverlauf und der Notwendigkeit, den Leberfettgehalt zu quantifizieren, möchten wir daran erinnern, dass bisher nur sehr wenige Medikamente bei NASH einen klinischen Nutzen gezeigt haben – dies hauptsächlich auf histologischer Basis ohne klinische Langzeit-Endpunkte. Die Schwierigkeiten, valide Studien auf diesem Gebiet auszuführen, sind so groß, dass neue Studienformen ins Auge gefasst werden 9 . Für die wenigen wirksamen Medikamente, für welche die nationalen Behörden in Europa keine Kostenerstattung geben, gibt es keine Evidenz, dass eine Abnahme des Leberfettgehalts als Surrogatmarker für dessen Wirksamkeit angesehen werden kann.…”
Section: Leberfett-quantifizierung: Brauchen Wir Das?unclassified
“…In keeping with the latter issue of changes over time and in connection with the need of liver fat quantification we would like to remind that extremely few drugs have provided some evidence of clinical benefit in NASH so far (and mainly on histology, without long term clinical endpoints). The difficulties in achieving positive trials in this field is so big, that new forms of studies are envisioned [9]. For these few effective drugs (and so far none of them widely accepted for reimbursement by National Agencies in Europe) there is no evidence that the decrease in liver fat content can be utilized as a surrogate marker of drug efficacy, limiting the need for liver fat quantification.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%