2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2022.02.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Platinum-Based Chemotherapy ‘Rechallenge’ in Advanced Non-ovarian Solid Malignancies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…About 70 percent of OC patients diagnosed at an advanced stage develop metastases that result in a loss of surgery, due to the absence of early detection strategies and symptoms ( 2 ). For most OC patients, traditional chemotherapy has extremely high side effects and poor efficacy ( 3 ). Therefore, it is urgent to find effective diagnostic markers and therapeutic targets for ovarian cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About 70 percent of OC patients diagnosed at an advanced stage develop metastases that result in a loss of surgery, due to the absence of early detection strategies and symptoms ( 2 ). For most OC patients, traditional chemotherapy has extremely high side effects and poor efficacy ( 3 ). Therefore, it is urgent to find effective diagnostic markers and therapeutic targets for ovarian cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equally, it would seem remiss to discount any systemic therapy commenced for the purpose of controlling ABC, and which precludes concurrent systemic therapy, from this analysis. For ovarian cancer, the well-established concept of a platinum-free interval may help guide the utility of re-challenge therapy; although an interval of 6 months in that setting is a typical cut-off after which re-challenge may be beneficial, this is still not universally agreed, and differences are expected between tumour types [28]. Platinum-free interval did not influence inclusion in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Stratification factors used for randomisation included: hospital site, Ki-67 (<55% vs ≥ 55%), ECOG PS (0/1 vs 2), Presence of liver metastases (Yes/No), response to platinum-based chemotherapy (resistant: progression during platinum treatment or progression ≤6 months from platinum completion, sensitive: progression >6 months from platinum completion, or intolerant, acknowledging that there is no standard definition and a lack of quality evidence to support this description in PD-EP-NEC, and thus this wording has been adapted from accepted ovarian cancer practice). 24 Summary statistics and Kaplan–Meier survival curves for PFS and OS are presented. A logistic regression model was used to assess association between baseline NSE and PFS status at 6 months post randomisation (Baseline NSE was entered into the model as a continuous variable.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%