2012
DOI: 10.1162/comj_a_00103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Playing with Constraints: Stylistic Variation with a Simple Electronic Instrument

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, participants' comments and actions suggest that the D-Box was perceived as a constrained device, reinforcing the theory that musicians tend to focus on the limits of a design (Magnusson, 2010), which in turn fosters style diversity and musical appropriation (Gurevich et al, 2012). Almost all the participants in the D-Box study worked on the limitations of the instrument, hacked constraints or because of constraints, and in some cases deliberately added them to their personal designs.…”
Section: Perception Of the Instrument: Limited Or Unconstrained?mentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, participants' comments and actions suggest that the D-Box was perceived as a constrained device, reinforcing the theory that musicians tend to focus on the limits of a design (Magnusson, 2010), which in turn fosters style diversity and musical appropriation (Gurevich et al, 2012). Almost all the participants in the D-Box study worked on the limitations of the instrument, hacked constraints or because of constraints, and in some cases deliberately added them to their personal designs.…”
Section: Perception Of the Instrument: Limited Or Unconstrained?mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The results from the Cube Instrument study as well as previous literature (Magnusson, 2010;Gurevich et al, 2012) suggest that the development of style is fostered, to a great extent, by the discovery of limitations in the instrument's metaphor. In the case of the Cube Instrument, the simplicity of the chosen design raised a homogeneous awareness of the constrained nature of its metaphor.…”
Section: Perception Of the Instrument: Limited Or Unconstrained?mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Both smartphones (Swift 2013) and tablets new digital musical instruments, but it is generally accepted that the performer is the most important stakeholder (O'Modhrain 2011), particularly when performing improvised music. Gurevich et al (2012) have used a groundedtheory approach to identify styles and skills that emerge when multiple participants engage with very simple electronic instruments. Fiebrink et al (2011) asked users to repeatedly evaluate interactive musical systems that use machine learning across a number of novel criteria, and this "direct evaluation" was found to have more utility than a typical cross-validation approach for machine learning systems.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twitter famously limited written notes to 140 characters (Gligorić et al 2018), Instagram constrained images to square format, and the (now defunct) Vine platform only allowed six second micro-videos (Redi et al 2014). Constraints are often thought to lead to increased variability and creativity in the arts (Stokes 2008) and in electronic musical instruments (Gurevich et al 2012). Posts in Twitter or Instagram are intended to be frequent, casual, and ephemeral, and it could be that these constrained formats have helped these apps to attract millions of users and encourage their creativity in the written word or photography.…”
Section: Social Music-making and Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%