2006
DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pleiotrophin, a candidate gene for poor tumor vasculature and in vivo neuroblastoma sensitivity to irinotecan

Abstract: In vivo neuroblastoma (NB) xenograft model, resistant to the DNA-topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan (CPT-11), has been established to study resistance mechanisms acquired in a therapeutic setting. Common mechanisms of resistance were not involved in this resistance. Thus, we compared the gene expression profiles of sensitive, resistant, and reverted tumors using cDNA expression arrays. Expression of selected transcripts was confirmed by quantitative real-time PCR. We found that pleiotrophin (PTN), a heparin-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
21
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…32 Regarding the latter category, two interacting partners, ALK (anaplastic lymphoma kinase) and one of its ligands, the secreted growth factor PTN (pleiptrophin), were both selected to indicate outcome of neuroblastoma patients. PTN was negatively correlated with poor survival (i.e., higher expression values correlate with better outcome), which is in line with reports by Calvet et al (53), who showed that PTN expression was downregulated in neuroblastoma resistant to certain cytostatic drugs and also with a study by Nakagawara and colleagues, who showed that PTN expression is correlated with lower tumor stages and a better prognosis (54). ALK, one of the receptors of the PTN protein, has a specific role in the development of the embryonic nervous system (55) and was found to be positively correlated with poor outcome (i.e., higher expression values correlate with poor outcome).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…32 Regarding the latter category, two interacting partners, ALK (anaplastic lymphoma kinase) and one of its ligands, the secreted growth factor PTN (pleiptrophin), were both selected to indicate outcome of neuroblastoma patients. PTN was negatively correlated with poor survival (i.e., higher expression values correlate with better outcome), which is in line with reports by Calvet et al (53), who showed that PTN expression was downregulated in neuroblastoma resistant to certain cytostatic drugs and also with a study by Nakagawara and colleagues, who showed that PTN expression is correlated with lower tumor stages and a better prognosis (54). ALK, one of the receptors of the PTN protein, has a specific role in the development of the embryonic nervous system (55) and was found to be positively correlated with poor outcome (i.e., higher expression values correlate with poor outcome).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Antisense PTN expression in human prostate LNCaP cells decreases prostate cancer cell-induced angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo [71,72]. On the other hand, antisense PTN expression in rat glioma C6 cells decreases glioma cell-induced angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo [73] and PTN seems to act as an angiostatic factor in an in vivo neuroblastoma model that is resistant to irinotecan [74]. In both cases, its regulatory effect on VEGF actions has been discussed as the most likely mechanism.…”
Section: Ptn and Angiogenesismentioning
confidence: 93%
“…1,10,11,30,31 Although the reasons for these discrepancies remain unclear, it is interesting to note that at least in some cases, the existing data suggest common effects of both molecules. For example, PTN acts as an angiostatic factor in an in vivo neuroblastoma model resistant to the DNA-topoisomerase I inhibitor irinotecan, 32 and NO has been also reported as an antiangiogenic molecule in neuroblastomas. 33 The mRNA levels of both PTN and RPTPb/f are decreased in colorectal cancers as compared with those in adjacent normal mucosa 34 and eNOS expression in colorectal carcinoma is significantly lower than in non-neoplasm colorectal mucosa, 35 while NO induces apoptosis in colon cancer cells 36,37 via ERK[1/2] activation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%