2008
DOI: 10.1086/523954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pleiotropic Constraint Hampers the Resolution of Sexual Antagonism in Vertebrate Gene Expression

Abstract: The numerous physiological and phenotypic differences between the sexes, as well as the disparity between male and female reproductive interests, result in sexual conflicts, which are often manifested at the genomic level. Sexually antagonistic genes benefit one sex at the expense of the other and experience strong pressure to evolve male- and female-specific expression patterns to resolve sexual conflicts and maximize fitness for both sexes. Sex-biased gene expression has recently been demonstrated for much o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
208
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(231 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
18
208
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation agrees with a previous observation that malerelated genes on the X have significantly lower rates of protein evolution compared to those on the autosomes (Cutter and Ward 2005). Lower conservation of female-biased genes on the X chromosome (with respect to both chromosomal location and copy number) may be due to greater functional pleiotropy of female-biased genes compared to male-biased genes Mank et al 2008b;Mank and Ellegren 2009;Meiklejohn and Presgraves 2012). If an X-linked femalebiased gene has a non-sex-biased role in many different tissues, there may be pressure to undergo gene duplication to allow one copy to carry out the sex-biased function and the other the pleiotropic functions (Maciejowski et al 2005).…”
Section: Conservation Of Chromosomal Location and Sex Bias Of One-to-supporting
confidence: 92%
“…This observation agrees with a previous observation that malerelated genes on the X have significantly lower rates of protein evolution compared to those on the autosomes (Cutter and Ward 2005). Lower conservation of female-biased genes on the X chromosome (with respect to both chromosomal location and copy number) may be due to greater functional pleiotropy of female-biased genes compared to male-biased genes Mank et al 2008b;Mank and Ellegren 2009;Meiklejohn and Presgraves 2012). If an X-linked femalebiased gene has a non-sex-biased role in many different tissues, there may be pressure to undergo gene duplication to allow one copy to carry out the sex-biased function and the other the pleiotropic functions (Maciejowski et al 2005).…”
Section: Conservation Of Chromosomal Location and Sex Bias Of One-to-supporting
confidence: 92%
“…For instance, pleiotropy would tend to obscure the relationship betweensex linkage and antagonist sexual selection (Fitzpatrick, 2004) usually going on when sexual selection on an ornament in one sex is stronger than natural selection acting against it in the other sex (Mank et al, 2008). Although not common in birds (O'Neill et al, 2000), genetic mechanisms as genomic imprinting for sex traits could be at work in the chromosomes of Ficedula flycatchers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A growing body of evidence suggests that loci with SA alleles exist in the genomes of various organisms (reviewed by Mank et al 2008;Bonduriansky and Chenoweth 2009;Delcourt et al 2009;Stulp et al 2012). However, the only known SA polymorphisms are in fish, where male characters involved in attractiveness to females increase predation risk.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%