2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2013.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pleistocene and Holocene glacier fluctuations upon the Kamchatka Peninsula

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there is evidence that some glaciers were covered by tephra as a result of these eruptions, there is no evidence to suggest that this had a discernible influence on glacier fluctuations during the period of observation. This likely reflects the longer response time of glaciers to tephra deposition, since a number of Kamchatka's glaciers are known to have responded to volcanic ash cover over longer time periods (see Barr and Solomina, 2014). It is also apparent, from the present study, that debris-covered glaciers on the peninsula are typically less responsive to external forcing, since they lose less surface area (both in absolute and, particularly, relative terms) than non-debris-covered examples.…”
Section: Volcanic Controls and Debris Covermentioning
confidence: 56%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Although there is evidence that some glaciers were covered by tephra as a result of these eruptions, there is no evidence to suggest that this had a discernible influence on glacier fluctuations during the period of observation. This likely reflects the longer response time of glaciers to tephra deposition, since a number of Kamchatka's glaciers are known to have responded to volcanic ash cover over longer time periods (see Barr and Solomina, 2014). It is also apparent, from the present study, that debris-covered glaciers on the peninsula are typically less responsive to external forcing, since they lose less surface area (both in absolute and, particularly, relative terms) than non-debris-covered examples.…”
Section: Volcanic Controls and Debris Covermentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Assuming linear trends, this indicates an area-loss rate of ∼ 0.24-0.29 % a −1 between 1950 and 2000 and a notable acceleration to ∼ 1.76 % a −1 since 2000. The reduction in glacier area during the late 20th century coincides with negative trends in glacier mass balance on the peninsula (see Barr and Solomina, 2014). Unfortunately, since 2000, mass balance data have not been collected for Kamchatka's glaciers, and it is not possible to assess whether accelerated mass loss over the early 21st century has coincided with the accelerated glacier shrinkage identified here.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Inventoriesmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations