2014
DOI: 10.4103/0976-3147.133580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma in a case of tuberous sclerosis

Abstract: Tuberous sclerosis is a known phakomatosis and the associated finding of a subependymal giant cell astrocytoma is common with this disorder. A case of tuberous sclerosis with a finding not previously reported, i.e. that of a pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma, is presented here.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These lesions were shown to be cases of PXT and fibrillary astrocytoma. [ 10 , 11 ] Therefore, the presence of a tumor should be taken into consideration in this case, given the progressive nature of the lesions in the MRI evaluation, although it is difficult to estimate whether the cystic mass in this case was a SEGA with atypical MRI presentation, a rare tumor associated with TSC, or a non-neoplastic lesion. Our findings imply that in patients with atypical brain MRI characteristics other than cortical or subcortical tubers, SENs or SEGA, further differential diagnosis should be considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These lesions were shown to be cases of PXT and fibrillary astrocytoma. [ 10 , 11 ] Therefore, the presence of a tumor should be taken into consideration in this case, given the progressive nature of the lesions in the MRI evaluation, although it is difficult to estimate whether the cystic mass in this case was a SEGA with atypical MRI presentation, a rare tumor associated with TSC, or a non-neoplastic lesion. Our findings imply that in patients with atypical brain MRI characteristics other than cortical or subcortical tubers, SENs or SEGA, further differential diagnosis should be considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%