C53. Lung Disease Due to Asbestos 2011
DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2011.183.1_meetingabstracts.a4810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pleural Effusion VEGF Levels As A Prognostic Factor Of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

Abstract: 2Corresponding author's email: ctabata@hyo-med.ac.jp Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive malignant tumor of mesothelial origin associated with asbestos Rationale: exposure. MPM has a limited response to conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy so early diagnosis of MPM is very important. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a potent mitogen for the vascular endothelium, is also known to be an autocrine growth factor for MPM. Here, we investigated the pleural effusion VEGF levels in pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prognostic significance of pVEGF-A has been estimated in several previous studies (13,14). Hirayama et al followed 28 malignant pleural mesothelioma patients closely for up to 600 days (13) and demonstrated that a VEGF level of >2,000 pg/ml was a significant predictor of patient survival (13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The prognostic significance of pVEGF-A has been estimated in several previous studies (13,14). Hirayama et al followed 28 malignant pleural mesothelioma patients closely for up to 600 days (13) and demonstrated that a VEGF level of >2,000 pg/ml was a significant predictor of patient survival (13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VEGF-A levels in malignant effusions were found to be significantly increased compared with those in non-malignant effusions, indicating that this difference may aid in the differentiation between malignant and non-malignant effusions (11,12). The altered expression of VEGF-A has been reported to be associated with the poor prognosis of various types of human cancer (13,14). Multiple clinical studies have also demonstrated the potential benefit of VEGF-A inhibition in patients with malignant effusions (15).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition a VEGF blockade has been identified to lead to marked reductions in ascites formation (1,5,8,19). Cancer-associated effusions contain significantly more VEGF than those resulting from inflammatory diseases, which suggests that VEGF levels are an independent and statistically significant prognostic indicator of survival (20,21). The results of a previous study revealed that hemorrhagic malignant effusions (RBC count, >1x10 4 /µl) exhibit significantly higher VEGF levels (1,942 pg/ml) compared with non-hemorrhagic effusions (202 pg/ml) (P= 0.016) in malignant patients (21).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…VEGF has an important role in increasing vascular permeability during malignant ascites formation (1)(2)(3)(4)(5). Previous studies have revealed that high concentrations of VEGF are detected in the hydrothorax and ascites fluid of cancer patients (20)(21)(22). The vascular permeabilizing activity of VEGF has been reported to be 50,000 times more potent than histamine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, VEGF levels in serum or pleural effusions of MM patients are higher than those found in patients with nonmalignant pleuritis or lung cancer involving malignant pleural effusions. Further, in MM patients elevated serum or pleural effusion levels of VEGF correlate with a worse prognosis and may also contribute to increase resistance to chemotherapy (Hirayama et al, 2011;Yasumitsu et al, 2010;Zebrowski et al, 1999). In fact, VEGF status has proved to be of value in predicting the effectiveness of radiotherapy and chemotherapy on different cancers (Choi et al, 2008;Kumar et al, 2009;Toi et al, 2001).…”
Section: Vegfmentioning
confidence: 99%