2021
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PLIP 2021: expanding the scope of the protein–ligand interaction profiler to DNA and RNA

Abstract: With the growth of protein structure data, the analysis of molecular interactions between ligands and their target molecules is gaining importance. PLIP, the protein–ligand interaction profiler, detects and visualises these interactions and provides data in formats suitable for further processing. PLIP has proven very successful in applications ranging from the characterisation of docking experiments to the assessment of novel ligand–protein complexes. Besides ligand–protein interactions, interactions with DNA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
677
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,076 publications
(680 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
677
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The docked pose of each ligand in both proteins was analysed using PLIP tools [ 47 ] to extract all established interactions with each target, and the obtained interaction profiles are shown in Figure 12 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The docked pose of each ligand in both proteins was analysed using PLIP tools [ 47 ] to extract all established interactions with each target, and the obtained interaction profiles are shown in Figure 12 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PyMOL Molecular Graphics (Version 1.8.4.0, Schrödinger, LLC) was used for the visualizations and graphics generations [ 33 ]. To determine the interactions of all the docking complexes, the protein-ligand interaction profiler (PLIP) was used to analyze the crystal structure of the available structural complexes [ 34 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To validate the docking method, we applied it to other literature dockings having M pro as a protein target [47], and used the N3 inhibitor as a reference compound (Figure 2), finding that the resulting scores were in line with those previously reported for ligands like the phenolic diterpene carnosol [46], bictegravir, and other molecules docked to the same protease [48]. We made use of the molecular graphics program embedded in 1-Clik Mcule for structural visualization of protein-ligand complexes and to obtain the snapshots of Figure 3A,B, while we obtained the protein-ligand interaction diagrams reported in the same figure (Figure 3C,D) and in Figure 4 by ProteinsPlus (https://proteins.plus/) or PLIP (Protein-Ligand Interaction Profiler, https://plip-tool.biotec.tu-dresden.de/) [49,50]. For the N3 inhibitor/astragalin-bound M pro structural comparison (Figure 3E), we made use of the matchmaker tool embedded in UCSF Chimera [51].…”
Section: Molecular Docking Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%