PLoS ONE: New Approaches and Initiatives in the Evolution of the Academic Journal

Binfield, Peter

doi:10.7771/2380-176x.2309

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition, the top right sign provides key metrics for citations, views, shares, and bookmarks. [28] As a result, PLoS One is not just a platform for digital papers, but also a potential place for discussion based on the topic context of the relevant papers. One of the benefits of PLoS One's process of documenting public discussion is that linking the comments section of the article to the media and recording full media coverage of the published article helps increase the journal's impact beyond the PLoS One platform and the academic community.…”

Section: Plos Onementioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, few domestic researchers have studied and introduced OPR cases. The current study examines the website of PLoS One, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP), F1000Research, the Semantic Web Journal (SWJ), and Acta Psychologica Sinica in China, [22][23][24][25][26] combines related materials, [14,[27][28][29][30][31] and compares the OPR process of these journals, providing reference for the practice, innovation, and reform of peer review of domestic science and technology (hereinafter referred to as scitech ) journals.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Open peer reviewed case studies in science and technology journals

Wang¹

2023

Edit Pract

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper provides reference for the implementation of open peer review (OPR) in Chinese scientific journals, so as to promote the openness of Chinese scientific journals in peer review and further conform to the spirit of scientific openness. The OPR process of PLoS One, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, F1000Research, the Semantic Web Journal, and Acta Psychologica Sinica was investigated. The five journals show many of the same OPR characteristics, but none of them implement OPR in the same way, which reflects the diversity of OPR practice process. Based on the actual situation, Chinese scientific journals should combine the advantages of open access and OPR with the advantages of traditional peer review flexibly and effectively, and optimize the implementation process of OPR.

show abstract

Section: Plos Onementioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Open peer reviewed case studies in science and technology journals

Wang¹

2023

Edit Pract

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Libraries, museums, universities and book market within the single digital information space: General and special <i>(Annual Report to the Crimea-2017 Third World Professional Forum)</i>

Шрайберг

2017

Naučnye i tehničeskie biblioteki

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The journal version of the Annual Report presented at Crimea-2017 Third World Professional Forum (full-text version was published in the brochure distributed among the Forum participants). Modern trends, particularly The Big Data (which is reality at libraries, universities, research centers, archives, museums, as well as publishing and book trade), open access and digitizing of information sources are analyzed in detail as major factors of information environment development. The statistics of the rise in information content is given. The extracts from the UN resolution «Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development» adopted on September 25, 2015, and set to forth starting January 1, 2016 are cited. Its goals and objectives directly related to libraries, archives and academic institutions are highlighted. The copyright issues are analyzed as well. The principles libraries, museums and archives are to observe while implementing new technologies are highlighted. The correlation between electronic and printed book at the present book market is analyzed. It is underlined that “live”, i.e. printed book and live communication are the main values in our current life.

show abstract

PLoS ONE: New Approaches and Initiatives in the Evolution of the Academic Journal

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Open peer reviewed case studies in science and technology journals

Open peer reviewed case studies in science and technology journals

Libraries, museums, universities and book market within the single digital information space: General and special <i>(Annual Report to the Crimea-2017 Third World Professional Forum)</i>

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About