Decentralization reforms have been undertaken around the world for about 45 years now, generating a significant body of literature. In this chapter, I will review a part of this literature and present some findings on the case of recent decentralization reforms at the regional level in Morocco. The chapter will emphasize the political economy drivers of decentralization reforms as the main explanations for the inconclusive evidence when it comes to local development.The chapter is structured as follows. This first section reviews the main definitions, typologies, drivers, promises and risk. The second section conceptualizes the links between decentralization and local development. The third section introduces the Moroccan case and reviews the main characteristics in terms of governance, finance and regional planning. It also highlights the relationship between decentralization and deconcentration reforms there and argues that the latter significantly constrains the former's potential to make a positive impact in terms of local development. The fourth section concludes.
Definition and TypologyA short definition of decentralization is provided by Faguet and Pöschl (2015, p. 2; citing Faguet andSánchez, 2013 andManor, 1999): 'the devolution by central (i.e. national) government of specific functions -with all of the administrative, political, and economic attributes that these entail -to regional and local (i.e. state/provincial and municipal) governments that are independent of the centre within given geographic and functional domains'. Devolution is also known as 'political' or 'democratic' decentralization. This is because devolution usually transfers responsibilities for services to municipalities that elect their own mayors and councils, raise their own revenues, and have independent authority to make investment decisions (Litvack, Junaid and Bird, 1998, p. 6). Traditionally, the literature distinguishes between two additional forms of decentralization: deconcentration and delegation (Parker, 1995, pp. 19ff; Rondinelli, 1999, p. 2). Deconcentration is the process by which the central government disperses responsibilities for certain services to its regional branch offices without involving any transfer of authority to lower levels of government (Litvack et al., 1998, p. 4). This is often considered the weakest form of decentralization (Rondinelli, 1999, p. 2). Delegation refers to a situation in which the central government transfers respon-