SAE Technical Paper Series 2020
DOI: 10.4271/2019-22-0004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PMHS and WorldSID Kinematic and Injury Response in Far-Side Events in a Vehicle-Based Test Environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, people with wider shoulders were less likely to slip out of the shoulder belt, resulting in differences in injury outcomes. Perez-Rapela et al 21 found that the shoulder motion showed the largest improvement after morphing the model, which indicated that the differences in shoulder motion may not be directly or solely attributable to the shoulder area but to the overall body shape and deformation. In order to be more widely representative, the Human Body Model (HBM) with different figures and shapes such as GHBMC (Global Human Body Models Consortium), THUMS (Total Human Model for Safety) should be used in future research.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, people with wider shoulders were less likely to slip out of the shoulder belt, resulting in differences in injury outcomes. Perez-Rapela et al 21 found that the shoulder motion showed the largest improvement after morphing the model, which indicated that the differences in shoulder motion may not be directly or solely attributable to the shoulder area but to the overall body shape and deformation. In order to be more widely representative, the Human Body Model (HBM) with different figures and shapes such as GHBMC (Global Human Body Models Consortium), THUMS (Total Human Model for Safety) should be used in future research.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Referring to the dummy injury evaluation index of the far side occupant protection,which is implemented by ENCAP regulations in 2020 [4]. In addition, according to the research results of K. digges and Erez rapela, it is pointed out that the head offset, chest compression and MX moment of the lower neck are most likely to exceed the standard [5][6]. so, the head offset, the compression of the lower chest ribs and the MX moment of the lower neck were selected for analyzed by this paper.…”
Section: Injury Index Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model adopts the multivariate model verification method of The Bayesian interval hypothesis testing based on statistical error [7], and the Bayesian reliability index is 75%, which can be considered that the accuracy of the model is 75%. The paper of K. Digges and Erez-Rapela pointed out that the head offset and neck injury of Far side occupant protection are most likely to exceed the limit value [8][9][10]. According to the far side injury characteristics of dummy, the far side correlation analysis mainly focuses on the evaluation of the movement trend.…”
Section: A Analysis Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schematic diagram of the simulation model B. Correlation Evaluation and Analysis of CORA and ISO MetricThe paper of K. Digges and Erez-Rapela pointed out that the head offset and neck injury of Far side occupant protection are most likely to exceed the limit value[8][9][10]. According to the far side injury characteristics of dummy, the far side correlation analysis mainly focuses on the evaluation of the movement trend.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%