1991
DOI: 10.1097/00000637-199101000-00009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PMMA Microspheres for Intradermal Implantation: Part I. Animal Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
70
0
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
70
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…60 The acrylic acid and its derivates were well known since 1890, but it was only in 1901 that solid and transparent acrylic acid polymers were made available. 61 Polymethilmethacrylate was first synthetised in 1902.…”
Section: Polymethilmethacrylatementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…60 The acrylic acid and its derivates were well known since 1890, but it was only in 1901 that solid and transparent acrylic acid polymers were made available. 61 Polymethilmethacrylate was first synthetised in 1902.…”
Section: Polymethilmethacrylatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…66 Experiences in animals have shown that the keys to biocompatibility with the skin are the spheric shape of the particle, its smooth and regular surface and the size of the polymethilmethacrylate microspheres. 60,67 The size of the molecules is important because very small particles can be easily phagocytised and the bigger ones do not easily pass through size 26 needle. The repeated washing of the microspheres reduces the impurities and renders the product more tolerable by reducing the number of foreign body giant cells around the injected PMMA particles.…”
Section: Polymethilmethacrylatementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For these purposes, the ideal material should be biocompatible, safe, and stable at the implantation site; additionally, this material should not cause protrusion through the skin or mucosa, as well as, should induce only minimal reactions against the foreign body, as phagocytosis-resistant and lose the potential to migrate to distant body sites. Moreover, this material should be inert in body fluids and easily manipulated during surgery; above all, it should not induce rejection or late complications [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have shown that polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) is biocompatible, does not generate an inflammatory response when implanted under the skin, and remains at the implantation site for long periods [11,18,19]. Because of its small number of side effects and its lasting results, PMMA is believed to be a good solution for dermal filling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%