“…The fabrication method of choice is guided by multiple factors, including available infrastructure (technology and equipment), fabrication speed, cost (multi-use or disposable devices), desired feature size, as well as the preferred fabrication material. While initially glass-and silicon-based materials were used to fabricate microfluidic devices Manz et al, 1992), replica molding has become a dominate trend in recent years due to its fast and inexpensive fabrication of microdevices using polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) (McDonald and Whitesides, 2002;Zhang et al, 2009Zhang et al, , 2010Berthier et al, 2012), hydrogels, thermoset composites (Carlborg et al, 2011;Sollier et al, 2011), and thermoplastics (Duffy et al, 1998;Fiorini et al, 2003Fiorini et al, , 2004Golden and Tien, 2007;Novak et al, 2013). The application of replica molding, also called "soft lithography" (Xia and Whitesides, 1998), eliminates the need for time-and cost-intensive clean room infrastructures.…”