2011
DOI: 10.1097/qco.0b013e32834cac17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in non-HIV-infected patients

Abstract: HIV-negative populations at risk for PJP can be identified. Conventional PCR increases diagnostic sensitivity but may detect asymptomatic colonization. Quantitative PCR demonstrates potential for distinguishing colonization from infection, but clinical validation is required. Serum (1→3)-β-D-glucan may be elevated in PJP, although standardized cut-off values for clinical infection have not been determined. Further validation of serum markers and molecular diagnostic methods is necessary for early and accurate … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
82
0
9

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
2
82
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Some authors support the initiation of a specific therapy when immunosuppression is persistent, considering that colonization could represent an early stage of the disease (27,28). However, this risk was found to be low in HIVinfected patients (29) and has only occasionally been reported in other immunocompromised patients (28,30,31). In our study, there was one case of an HIV-positive patient, diagnosed as colonized based on a first BAL fluid analysis, who was not treated with anti-Pneumocystis therapy, and whose second BAL fluid sample, 10 days later, was negative for P. jirovecii by qPCR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors support the initiation of a specific therapy when immunosuppression is persistent, considering that colonization could represent an early stage of the disease (27,28). However, this risk was found to be low in HIVinfected patients (29) and has only occasionally been reported in other immunocompromised patients (28,30,31). In our study, there was one case of an HIV-positive patient, diagnosed as colonized based on a first BAL fluid analysis, who was not treated with anti-Pneumocystis therapy, and whose second BAL fluid sample, 10 days later, was negative for P. jirovecii by qPCR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 HIV-negative patients present with a lower burden of pathogen, which limits the diagnostic sensitivity of staining methods. 12 Although some controversy remains regarding the significance of a positive PCR with a negative stain, 13,14 in our cases, the presence of a compatible clinical picture, lack of other likely pathogens, and response to anti-Pneumocystis treatment allow us to make the diagnosis of PCP by PCR only. Of note, the 1 case with positive DFA (case #4) was quite similar to the others.…”
Section: Case #2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical significance of P. jiroveci in respiratory specimens and viability of organisms detected only by PCR were unknown. In the study of Reid et al (2011), conventional PCR increased diagnostic sensitivity but may have detected asymptomatic colonization. They claimed that quantitative PCR demonstrated potential for distinguishing colonization from infection, but clinical validation was required.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%