2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.joa.2014.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pocket creation in the prepectoral subfascial position for the implantation of a cardiac implantable electrical device

Abstract: a b s t r a c tPockets created in the prepectoral subcutaneous space in electrophysiology laboratories for the implantation of a cardiac implantable electrical device (CIED) have several advantages; however, lean or small subjects are thought to cause pocket erosion. To minimize such traumatic pocket complications, prepectoral subfascial implantation has been employed since the early 1990s. In this paper, we introduce a method for prepectoral subfascial pocket creation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For all implant surgeries, there was no prior intervention on the device pocket site. The location of the pocket varied as determined by the operating surgeon, and the implantation was made approximately one third of the distance from the lateral clavicle, as recommended in a previous study 2 . The leads were fixed using a sleeve, and the sleeves were also fixed to the muscle at two points.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For all implant surgeries, there was no prior intervention on the device pocket site. The location of the pocket varied as determined by the operating surgeon, and the implantation was made approximately one third of the distance from the lateral clavicle, as recommended in a previous study 2 . The leads were fixed using a sleeve, and the sleeves were also fixed to the muscle at two points.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 It is recommended that the pocket can be placed beneath the major pectoralis muscle, especially in Japanese individuals. 36 In Kawatani et al, 33 the thickness of subcutaneous tissue is measured as 2.6 mm, while pectoralis major muscle has 5.6 mm thickness in the ultrasound examination. Thus, the total thickness is around 8.2 mm from the outer skin to the bottom of the pectoralis major muscle.…”
Section: Lc-s Compensation Network and Experimental Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An intramuscular pocket between the pectoral muscular layers may be used for the patients with little subcutaneous fat 35 . It is recommended that the pocket can be placed beneath the major pectoralis muscle, especially in Japanese individuals 36 . In Kawatani et al, 33 the thickness of subcutaneous tissue is measured as 2.6 mm, while pectoralis major muscle has 5.6 mm thickness in the ultrasound examination.…”
Section: Prototype Design Of Wpt Converter With Lc‐s Compensation For...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To minimize such traumatic pocket complications, prepectoral subfascial implantation has been employed since the early 1990s mainly for large devices ( Fig. 1 ) [31] , [32] , although limited data support this practice. In any and all circumstances, hematoma formation should be avoided by meticulous cautery of bleeding sites since hematoma involving a pocket has been identified as a risk factor in device placement [33] .…”
Section: Prevention Of Cied Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%