2016
DOI: 10.1111/cgf.13068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Point Cloud Denoising via Moving RPCA

Abstract: We present an algorithm for the restoration of noisy point cloud data, termed Moving Robust Principal Components Analysis (MRPCA). We model the point cloud as a collection of overlapping two‐dimensional subspaces, and propose a model that encourages collaboration between overlapping neighbourhoods. Similar to state‐of‐the‐art sparse modelling‐based image denoising, the estimated point positions are computed by local averaging. In addition, the proposed approach models grossly corrupted observations explicitly,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
101
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, other local fitting approaches have also been used for point cloud denoising, using robust jet‐fitting with re‐projection [CP05, CP07] or various forms of bilateral filtering on point clouds [HWG*13, DDF17], which take into account both point coordinates and normal directions for better preservation of edge features. A closely related set of techniques is based on sparse representation of the point normals for better feature preservation [ASGCO10, SSW15, MC17]. Denoising is then achieved by projecting the points onto the estimated local surfaces.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, other local fitting approaches have also been used for point cloud denoising, using robust jet‐fitting with re‐projection [CP05, CP07] or various forms of bilateral filtering on point clouds [HWG*13, DDF17], which take into account both point coordinates and normal directions for better preservation of edge features. A closely related set of techniques is based on sparse representation of the point normals for better feature preservation [ASGCO10, SSW15, MC17]. Denoising is then achieved by projecting the points onto the estimated local surfaces.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Denoising is then achieved by projecting the points onto the estimated local surfaces. These techniques are very robust for small noise but can lead to significant over‐smoothing or over‐sharpening for high noise levels [MC17, HJW*17].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that finding α is an off-line process and then we can determine γ opt for a given noisy point cloud based on its estimated noise variance. Results for Noise Variance Estimation: The proposed noise variance estimation method is compared with the PCA-based method mentioned in Section VI-D. Point cloud models we use are Bunny provided in [43], Gargoyle, DC, and Daratech provided in [23], [27]. To show the performance of noise variance estimation quantitatively, the relative percentage error ( ) in terms of the noise standard deviation (SD) is computed as follows:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, σ 2 is unknown in general. In the point cloud denoising literature [19], [23], [31], [32], [52], typically σ 2 is assumed known or γ opt is tuned experimentally for best performanceneither is realizable in practice when only a noisy point cloud is given as input.…”
Section: A Weight Parameter and Noise Variancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to evaluate the proposed method, we compare with three competitive approaches: the mean-curve based featurepreserving simplification in [11], the graph-based contourextracted resampling in [3], and the uniform sampling method using the voxel-grid in PCL [19]. We test on several point clouds, including Daratech, Anchor, Armadillo, Shutter [20], and Hand 1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%