2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2014.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Point-of-care technologies for molecular diagnostics using a drop of blood

Abstract: Molecular diagnostics is critical for prevention, identification, and treatment of disease. Traditional technologies for molecular diagnostics using blood are limited to laboratory use because they rely on sample purification and sophisticated instruments, are labor- and time-intensive and expensive, and require highly trained operators. This review discusses the frontiers of point-of-care diagnostic technologies using a drop of blood obtained from a finger-prick. These technologies, including emerging biotech… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
146
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 200 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
146
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reporter signal is amplified, generating a readout that is proportional to the concentration of target as determined using a previously derived calibration function. When a reporter-linked affinity reagent binds nonspecifically to the substrate, however, it gives rise to false positives that are indistinguishable from true protein capture events (8,9). It is obvious that the use of a single reporter-conjugated affinity reagent would generally produce a greater frequency of false positives than an assay based on two affinity reagents (both labeled with reporters), as a positive report from the former assay cannot be as confidently associated with the binding to a target protein.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reporter signal is amplified, generating a readout that is proportional to the concentration of target as determined using a previously derived calibration function. When a reporter-linked affinity reagent binds nonspecifically to the substrate, however, it gives rise to false positives that are indistinguishable from true protein capture events (8,9). It is obvious that the use of a single reporter-conjugated affinity reagent would generally produce a greater frequency of false positives than an assay based on two affinity reagents (both labeled with reporters), as a positive report from the former assay cannot be as confidently associated with the binding to a target protein.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth and most important, for prehospital biomarkers, new large stroke cohorts have recently been recruited for dedicated discovery of prehospital biomarkers, with first blood samples obtained on scene, within the golden hour after symptom onset [18,19]. Finally, ongoing progress in the development of POC technology has provided a wide range of novel measurement techniques for development of rapid ambulance assays [20].…”
Section: Future Progressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Key considerations in the choice of an appropriate technology are the ability to multiplex, assay time, cost, reliability and simplicity (Song et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%