2010
DOI: 10.1038/aps.2010.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Point-of-care test of heart-type fatty acid-binding protein for the diagnosis of early acute myocardial infarction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others demonstrated that H‐FABP is a strong predictor of mortality in patients with cardiovascular disorders: acute pulmonary embolism , chronic pulmonary hypertension , acute coronary syndrome , acute chest pain , and chronic heart failure . H‐FABP is a very sensitive marker of acute myocardial and kidney damage , and is now known also to contribute to a more accurate prediction of the 3‐year survival of HD patients maybe because the HD treatment itself caused myocardial damage .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others demonstrated that H‐FABP is a strong predictor of mortality in patients with cardiovascular disorders: acute pulmonary embolism , chronic pulmonary hypertension , acute coronary syndrome , acute chest pain , and chronic heart failure . H‐FABP is a very sensitive marker of acute myocardial and kidney damage , and is now known also to contribute to a more accurate prediction of the 3‐year survival of HD patients maybe because the HD treatment itself caused myocardial damage .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies were conducted to compare using POC tests vs central laboratory assays in terms of identifying acute MI and outcome prediction in patients presented with chest pain, with some for and others against the POC (Li et al, 2010;Venge et al, 2010;Goodacre et al, 2011). Efforts on designing and developing more efficient POC assays are still in progress, the main focus being on their reliability, ease of use and rapid performance (Wang et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We included eight recent studies that have been published since the other meta-analysis was undertaken12–14 17–19 22 23 and excluded six older studies that used the old WHO definition of MI35–40 and one study where we were unable to extract data 41. Thus, only nine studies15 16 20 21 24–28 were included in both reviews.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%