2016 13th Conference on Computer and Robot Vision (CRV) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/crv.2016.59
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Point Pair Feature Based Object Detection for Random Bin Picking

Abstract: Abstract-Point pair features are a popular representation for free form 3D object detection and pose estimation. In this paper, their performance in an industrial random bin picking context is investigated. A new method to generate representative synthetic datasets is proposed. This allows to investigate the influence of a high degree of clutter and the presence of self similar features, which are typical to our application. We provide an overview of solutions proposed in literature and discuss their strengths… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The object pose estimation problem in bin picking scenarios has been investigated using local invariant features (e.g., point pair features [1,2]) and template-matching [3]. However, these approaches do not show acceptable performance in bin picking from a cluttered pile of textureless small objects.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The object pose estimation problem in bin picking scenarios has been investigated using local invariant features (e.g., point pair features [1,2]) and template-matching [3]. However, these approaches do not show acceptable performance in bin picking from a cluttered pile of textureless small objects.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To tackle this problem, an RGB-D or depth camera is usually installed on top of the bin. There are existing solutions to bin picking of large objects, mostly using local invariant features [1,2] or template-matching algorithms [3], which rely on the computationally expensive evaluation of many pose hypotheses. Moreover, local features do not perform well for texture-less objects, and thus, template-matching often fails in heavily cluttered scenes with severely occluded objects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some research suggests that primates and humans have separate neural pathways for object recognition and grasping [17], and the object detection and pose estimation has often been treated as an isolated problem separated from grasp selection in the bin-picking literature. Geometry-based methods have been well explored for pose estimation in bin-picking, such as Abbeloos et al [24], that uses the popular point pair feature approach, first presented by Drost et al [27]. Buchhilz et al [26] suggests a two-stage approach where the full object pose is estimated after grasping based on inertial features.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a problem that often occurs in industrial settings where objects come out of a production line packaged in bulk, without isolating individual objects, and where the objects are transported to a second production line that subsequently must isolate and process these objects individually. Due to the importance and relevance of the problem, bin picking has been well studied [19], [24]- [26] in the literature. Challenges in bin picking arise when seeking to develop a bin picking algorithm that can be automatically customized for specific objects, and when these objects are very reflective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Point pair feature similarity: Point pair features [13][8] [3] describe the relative position and orientation of points on the surface of an object ( Figure 2). For two points m 1 and m 2 with normals n 1 and n 2 ,…”
Section: Matching Triplets Of Keypointsmentioning
confidence: 99%