Pola Pemberatan Pidana dalam Hukum Pidana Khusus

Huda, Chairul

doi:10.20885/iustum.vol18.iss4.art3

Cited by 3 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Pola pemidanaan (termasuk juga pola pemberatan) pada hakekatnya adalah suatu gejala tersirat dari ancaman pidana yang terkandung pada undang-undang, yang dapat diketahui pembentuk undang-undang berkenaan dengan jumlah dan jenis pidana yang dijatuhi kepada pelaku tindak pidana. 31 Dari pengertian tersebut maka pemberatan pidana dapat dimaknai dengan penjatuhan pidana yang lebih berat, maka dari itu pemberatan pidana bisa disebabkan karena adanya alasanalasan tertentu baik itu ditetapkan pada KUHP ataupun diluar KUHP.…”

Section: Ketentuan Pemberatan Pidana Bagi Subjek Hukum Tindak Pidana ...unclassified

Putusan Pemidanaan dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Membantu Menyediakan Pornografi Anak: Studi Putusan PN Bandung

Lestari,

Nurhayati,

Nugroho

et al. 2023

rch

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Pornography is an act that causes anxiety and concern for the community. Viewing pornographic videos is increasingly accessible, both through print and electronic media. The development of media with pornographic elements has increased the existence of pornographic crimes among the public. The definition of a pornographic crime is an immoral act related to sex in the form of a picture, sketch, photograph, writing, video or through other media shown in public which violates the norms of decency in society. This study aims to, firstly, analyze the suitability of the Bandung District Court's decision number 517/Pid.Sus/2018/Pn.Bdg regarding the crime of assisting in providing child pornography based on trial facts. Second, analyzing the imposition of weighting for criminal law subjects that are specific in nature. This research method uses normative juridical research methods with statutory and conceptual approaches. The conclusions obtained are, firstly the Judge in his ruling stated that the defendants were proven guilty of committing the crime of helping to provide child pornography which was not in accordance with the facts of the trial as seen from the testimony of witnesses and the testimony of the defendant and in that decision the victim was a child so the actions of the defendants were more in line with the crime allowing children to commit obscene acts, therefore the punishment is heavier than the Pornography Law. Second, the Pornography Law does not regulate the burden of criminal penalties for special criminal law subjects such as those closest to the victim. When compared with the Child Protection Act, this regulates criminal sanctions for legal subjects of special criminal offenses with an additional 1/3 (one third) of the threat of the article. So the punishment for those closest to the child is more severe than for other people who are not the closest person to the child victim.

show abstract

Section: Ketentuan Pemberatan Pidana Bagi Subjek Hukum Tindak Pidana ...unclassified

Putusan Pemidanaan dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Membantu Menyediakan Pornografi Anak: Studi Putusan PN Bandung

Lestari,

Nurhayati,

Nugroho

et al. 2023

rch

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…1 Menjadi menarik karena dalam konsep hukum pidana, pasti semua tindak pidana adalah merupakan perbuatan tercela, namun tidak semua perbuatan tercela merupakan tindak pidana. 2 Di Indonesia subtansi hukum pidana 3 dapat ditemukan dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHPidana). 4 Asas yang paling penting dalam KUHPidana ini adalah asas legalitas, yang bermakna bahwa: "moniat lex, priusquam feriat," artinya undang-undang harus memberikan peringatan terlebih dahulu sebelum merealisasikan ancaman yang terkandung di dalamnya.…”

Section: A Pendahuluanunclassified

“…Jakarta: Pustaka Pena Press, h. 99-102. 3 Hukum pidana formil di Indonesia telah diatur dalam Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 (UU No. 8 Tahun 1981) tentang Hukum Acara Pidana, (KUHAP), keberadaan KUHAP ini tentu saja untuk mengapai cita cita bangsa Indonesia sebagaimana yang terdapat dalam UUD 1945 yakni: melindungi segenap bangsa Indonesia dan tumpah darah indonesia.…”

Section: A Pendahuluanunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Perbuatan Tercela Sebagai Salah Satu Alasan Pemakzulan Presiden Dan/Atau Wakil Presiden Dalam Kajian Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia

Irham

Mulyati

2021

SASI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study is to find out what is meant by the President and/or Vice President committing a disgraceful act in the concept of criminal law, so that they can be impeached. By using normative legal research and approaches to legal concepts, laws and their history. The results of the research are as follows: First, all actions that are contrary to the Criminal Code are disgraceful acts for the President/Vice President; Second, the religious values, social culture of the Indonesian nation, as well as moral principles in the Criminal Code have been compiled in Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution, therefore any deviation from the behavior of the President/Vice President against the 1945 Constitution is a despicable act; Third, all disgraceful acts of the President/Vice President that violate criminal law offenses are subject to criminal sanctions in accordance with the Criminal Code, so that disgraceful acts that have been formally regulated in the Criminal Code are not the meaning of disgraceful acts as referred to in Article 7A of the 1945 Constitution, because the limitations of criminal acts have been determined can impeach the President/Vice President, namely: corruption, bribery, and other serious crimes; Fourth, the disgraceful act of the President/Vice President in Article 7A of the 1945 Constitution is an act of violating the 1945 Constitution as a reference to the rules of criminal law.

show abstract

“…Returning state financial losses is only one of the mitigating factors so that perpetrators do not return state losses to the maximum [15]. The implementation of this article is an argumentum a contrario of the goal of eradicating corruption in the Anti-Corruption Law [16]. This also encourages the elimination of criminal acts for perpetrators of corruption who return state financial losses as a restorative from the losses incurred.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Optimization of the Corruption Court in Minimizing State Losses Due to Corruption

Ismunarno¹,

Hartiwiningsih²,

Isharyanto³

2022

Proceedings of the International Conference for Democracy and National Resilience 2022 (ICDNR 2022)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The research aims to answer: (i) the arguments of the judiciary for corruption have not been able to minimize state losses due to corruption, and (ii) ideal efforts to optimize the judiciary for criminal acts of corruption to minimize state losses due to corruption. Penalties for perpetrators of corruption in Indonesia are dominated by imprisonment. This is less effective, especially in terms of recovering state assets and state financial losses due to corruption. The state is very disadvantaged, in addition to financial losses, the state must spend a lot of money on investigating corruption cases. It is necessary to optimize the judiciary for criminal acts of corruption to minimize state losses due to corruption as an effective effort to restore state financial losses and the overall costs incurred by the state in eradicating corruption. This article is normative using primary and secondary legal materials and is analyzed deductively with a legal, case, and conceptual approach. The results show: (i) the arguments of the judiciary for corruption have not been able to minimize state losses due to corruption, namely: legal substance is dominated by imprisonment and fines, limited legal options and facilities, traditional criminal-oriented community legal culture and political intervention in law enforcement for criminal acts of corruption; (ii) the ideal effort to optimize the judiciary for criminal acts of corruption to minimize state losses due to corruption is carried out by prioritizing restoration of state losses based on restorative justice and calculating the social costs of corruption.

show abstract

Pola Pemberatan Pidana dalam Hukum Pidana Khusus

Cited by 3 publications

References 3 publications

Putusan Pemidanaan dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Membantu Menyediakan Pornografi Anak: Studi Putusan PN Bandung

Putusan Pemidanaan dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Membantu Menyediakan Pornografi Anak: Studi Putusan PN Bandung

Perbuatan Tercela Sebagai Salah Satu Alasan Pemakzulan Presiden Dan/Atau Wakil Presiden Dalam Kajian Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia

Optimization of the Corruption Court in Minimizing State Losses Due to Corruption

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About